Swimming pool law change 'reckless'

By Martin Johnston

Starship children's hospital specialists will tell MPs today that the Building (Pools) Amendment Bill must be withdrawn or at least subjected to a major rewrite. Photo / Getty Images
Starship children's hospital specialists will tell MPs today that the Building (Pools) Amendment Bill must be withdrawn or at least subjected to a major rewrite. Photo / Getty Images

The proposed weakening of swimming pool fencing law is a "reckless" experiment which will lead to an increase in toddler drownings and permanent brain injuries, say child health specialists.

Starship children's hospital specialists will tell MPs today that the Building (Pools) Amendment Bill must be withdrawn or at least subjected to a major rewrite.

The Government says its proposed replacement of the 1987 Fencing of Swimming Pools Act with changes to the Building Act will reduce compliance costs by $17 million a year and that six more drownings may be prevented every 10 years through the requirement for five-yearly inspections.

The bill would, from next January, scrap the need to "fence" new home pools, replacing this with the requirement to have "physical barriers that restrict access to the pool by unsupervised children under 5".

Starship is among around 200 organisations and individuals to make a submission on the bill to Parliament's local government and environment committee.

Dr Mike Shepherd, a Starship emergency department specialist, said of the bill: "I think it is reckless ... They are proposing an unscientific experiment."

The hospital says the 1987 act has been highly successful in preventing harm to children.

"We estimate that since its introduction, at least 200 New Zealand toddlers' lives have been saved and at least as many children have avoided permanent severe brain injury."

Most children who die in home swimming pools, the hospital says, are found fully clothed, suggesting they were playing when they fell in, and investigations have shown how quickly and silently they drown.

"This bill removes the current mandatory requirement for pools to be fenced, replacing this with potentially multiple, duplicated and untested measures permitted within acceptable solutions, alternative solutions, determinations and waivers.

"One clause of the proposed Acceptable Standard ... reduces the existing safety of pool fence gates. This section does not require gates to be self-latching, as currently required in the ... act."

Instead, gates must be "not able to be readily opened by children", although they will still have to open outwards and swing shut automatically.

"Auckland council currently inspect pools three-yearly and report a 50 per cent failure rate on first inspection. Most failures are for gates and are fixed promptly at the time of inspection. This suggests three-yearly inspections are both critical for safety and are highly cost-effective."

Dr Shepherd said that instead of watering down the law, MPs should strengthen it by measures such as requiring pools to have "four-sided" isolation fences rather than allowing direct access to a pool enclosure through a child-restricted house door.

Pool fence laws

• Most swimming pools, including spa pools, must have a 1.2m-high fence with a self-closing, self-latching gate.

Inspections

• The councils, including Auckland - where 60 per cent of pools are sited - inspect the fences every three years.

• Those covering another 20 per cent inspect the fences at varying periods.

• The remaining 20 per cent are never inspected.

Proposed changes include

• Five-yearly inspections everywhere.

• Pool suppliers must tell buyers of their obligations to restrict children's access.

• Spa pools with child-resistant covers will be exempt.

- NZ Herald

Get the news delivered straight to your inbox

Receive the day’s news, sport and entertainment in our daily email newsletter

SIGN UP NOW

© Copyright 2017, NZME. Publishing Limited

Assembled by: (static) on production bpcf05 at 19 Jan 2017 09:43:30 Processing Time: 668ms