The truth is that the relationship between Parliamentary Service and Press Gallery journalists is not so much toxic as non-existent. All the gallery's dealings with the service are through the Speaker. There is little opportunity - and little effort made - to build trust and respect between the bureaucrats and journalists.
Journalists have long thought parliamentary authorities view the gallery as a nuisance that has to be tolerated rather than an essential part of the democratic fabric which should be given every assistance to do its job - and get it right.
The gallery's long but ultimately futile campaign to have the offices of its member news organisations located much closer to the parliamentary chamber is testimony to that. Those efforts to have the gallery returned to the second floor of Parliament Buildings - where it was before the complex was quake-strengthened in the early 1990s - have been blocked at every turn.
Combine that disdain for the gallery with the willingness of Parliamentary Service to bend over backwards to please its political masters and you long had the ingredients for an accident waiting to happen.
Some good may come of all this though. The Speaker, David Carter, has been hugely embarrassed, especially in having had to yesterday change his version of what occurred.
His referring to Parliament's privileges committee of the issues raised by the release of phone records and swipe-card movements of the Dominion Post's Andrea Vance around the complex is to be applauded. As is his forthright and very genuine apology.
Likewise the intervention by the Prime Minister by way of a letter to the Speaker. But Key realises what is at stake here.
The last thing he - or any politician for that matter - needs is the media really turning feral, especially when he has highly contentious spy laws to pass.
Debate on this article is now closed.