Certainly those who ripped off a sick child and a firefighter in Wanganui had little regard for the impact of their actions or the type of person their victim might have been; they simply saw something they had to have and took it. For some reason it seems more abhorrent to steal from a sick child and someone who saves lives than from the rest of us. I'm not sure why that is, and it's doubtful the burglars made any determination about their victims' situation or standing in society. Not that it matters - theft is theft, and on no account is it acceptable.
The thieves have already made a conscious decision to break the law, invade someone's private space and take things, often very personal items. And that is what victims regularly point to as being the most hurtful.
Material possessions can be replaced, and the psychological impact and feeling of invasion will abate in time, but photographs and mementos with sentimental value can never be replaced.
Wouldn't it be nice if, in this instance, the people responsible had an attack of conscience and returned the most sentimental items, as if to disprove the theory there is no honour among thieves. Somehow, I think we all know that won't happen.
Feedback: editor@wanganuichronicle.co.nz