Of our migrants, they're among the cream; studious, hard-working and imbued in decency. But with the civil war over, still they come, fleeing the oppressive mismanagement of their homeland.
Afghani and Syrian migrants need no explanation. The exodus of more than two million Syrians is at crisis proportions for its neighbours. This specially tough on Jordan, a poor country already awash with Iraqis; likewise Lebanon and Turkey struggling to cope with the influx.
They're now forced further afield, spreading across Europe.
Bulgaria has taken the most on a population basis but now intends spending millions it can ill-afford on a lengthy fence.
It won't work just as it doesn't with the Mexican border fence and, today, the US hosts millions of illegal Hispanics, this a contentious issue in last year's presidential race.
It's also huge in Europe, the destination for black and North African jobseekers fleeing their mismanaged nations. Tunisia - its people better educated than its neighbours - has huge unemployment and their desperate job-seekers easily slip across to southern Europe seeking salvation in countries themselves suffering disastrous unemployment problems.
Sweden has now offered to take all Syrians who turn up, to the outrage of their burgeoning anti-immigrant party.
Unpopular migration into Britain has resulted in UKIP's spectacular rise although its concerns are more with eastern Europeans and, particularly, gypsies flooding in legally under the European Union pact and exploiting the welfare system.
Similar anti-migrant political parties are polling strongly throughout western Europe - some, particularly in Hungary and Greece, of a decidedly fascist bent.
The Brits welcome foreign nurses, otherwise they virtually won't have any; plus Polish building workers, noted for getting the job done.
The revelation that entrepreneurs are training building tradesmen to acquire Polish accents says it all.
Apparently people would call, say, Phoenix Plumbers and put the phone down if a Polish voice didn't answer. As said, they wanted the job done, not messed about with.
Everyone or their ancestors were migrants at some stage, but we all claim the right to determine who we allow into our countries.
The problem is what to do when they arrive illegally in large numbers.
Australia established concentration camps but they didn't deter and played on people's consciences, more so as they contain numerous children.
A current dreadful strategy is to dump them in Papua New Guinea which has accepted sizeable sums for taking them.
Australia's also given Sri Lanka two patrol boats which will stem the flow from that country, evidenced by the Australian Refugee Council slamming the move.
But the main problem lies with Indonesia, the launching pad for the illegals, now understandably in a huff over the revelations of Australia's cyber-spying on their leaders' telephones and computers - thus they've withdrawn from co-operation, not that they intended any as it was.
But what of our country? To date, our geographic isolation has provided immunity from the boat people, but that won't last as the world abounds in cheap, old ships and, inevitably, one laden with illegal migrants will turn up here - more so as that same isolation gives us an Elysian Fields imagery in the eyes of people enduring hardship in distant lands.
It will be easy to send ashore, in simple barges, hundreds of migrants along, say, 90-Mile Beach.
As with Australia, the navy will be helpless dealing with this. Hobson's choice will invariably see us accept them, resulting in ever more arriving.
There's no answer to this problem, other than not viewing it as a problem and instead accepting a multi-race future; a miniature melting pot as lies at the heart of America's greatness.
The grandchildren of today's 20-year-olds will all be part Asian, Arab and God knows what else, and be better for this infusion.
