Te Tai Hauauru is the second largest Maori electorate - the largest at 161,443sq km, Te Tai Tonga, plays host to 20 general electorates within its boundaries. Just for comparison sake, this makes it roughly 7000 times larger than the Epsom electorate.
But there's another anomaly other than size -and that is that the law prevents any general electorate from spanning the Cook Strait, but not the Maori electorates. Te Tai Tonga, therefore, comprises all of the South Island, Stewart Island/Rakiura, the Chatham Islands, and also extends into the North Island to include Wellington and parts of the Hutt Valley as far north as Avalon and Tawa.
We believe the special nature of the seven Maori electorates, serving the equivalent of 63 general electorates, should be a key priority in resourcing decisions. This is not just an issue of size. The scope of each Maori electorate - the diverse nature of the populations included within each - is stratified by township, by iwi, by rural and urban communities as well as by significant geographical boundaries. And expectations of tangata whenua are rightfully high.
Their expectations were mirrored in a 2007 review (the Goulter Report) which noted the principle to "recognise the fundamental importance of information to a modern Parliament and of communication between MPs and their constituencies and communities".
John Goulter concluded that there was inequality between the support Parliament offers the very large electorates and that given to the smaller ones and consequently more support should be given to all seven Maori electorates.
His report described logistical problems with "getting around" and meeting the people especially where distant locations provide transport problems.
It also reported that the protocols linked to customs and practices concerning wh?nau, marae, hap? and iwi dynamics result in much lengthier visits for Maori MPs than might be the case in non-Maori constituencies.
In 2008, the Maori Party successfully enabled an increase in the resourcing allocated to Maori electorates, which addressed the issues outlined by Goulter.
And yet, at the end of 2011, a bizarre move was made to reduce the level of large Maori electorate funding. In the five years since the Goulter Report, I have no evidence that there has been any change affecting either the "logistical problems" or, in fact, the protocols we live by.
The ability to serve the most marginalised of our whanau has been compromised by this decision to redistribute resources to large general electorates. I do not believe it is fair for either Maori electorate MPs, or more importantly the constituents we represent, that after just three years of receiving equitable resourcing, a snap decision has reverted the situation back to before.
What do you think? The Maori Party would love to hear from you. tariana.turia@parliament.govt.nz
