The impact of valuations is eased by the council's uniform annual charge, levied on every property equally, but they can have a significant effect. Most other charges, such as sewerage, roading, ward rates and a raft of regional council levies, are fixed, and are not affected by valuations.
The value of non-residential properties, such as commercial premises, farms and forests, have on average increased less than residential properties since 2016.
Increases in the average residential property valuations around the Far North are: Kaeo 173 per cent, Kaitaia/Awanui 73 per cent, Hihi 72 per cent, Kerikeri 53 per cent, Kawakawa 52 per cent, Moerewa 48 per cent, Rāwene 45 per cent, Ōkaihau 40 per cent, Paihia 37 per cent, Rangiputa/Whatuwhiwhi 34 per cent, Kaikohe 33 per cent, Doubtless Bay 30 per cent, Ōpononi/Ōmāpere 29 per cent, Ahipara 27 per cent, Whangaroa 24 per cent, Russell 22 per cent, Kohukohu 9 per cent.
The average in Kaitaia is now $65,833, in Kaikohe $53,339, and in Kerikeri $295,901. Russell still has the highest average, $460,282.
■ Go to www.fndc.govt.nz/Our-Services/Rates/Rating-information-database-new to check your rates before and after the property revaluation.Time for a fairer system?
****
The Far North District Council is planning a review of all its revenue, including rates, in a bid to make the rating system fairer and more consistent. The options include changing from land value to capital value, spreading the capital costs of sewerage and water schemes across all properties, restoring development contributions and reducing the commercial differential.
Whatever it might do, it won't come quick enough for Kerikeri businessman Bill Fenton and the more than 30 people who turned up at a public meeting he called to discuss pending rate increases in the town.
''We're dealing with a pandemic. People are struggling to recover their businesses without the council shoving rates up," he said, adding that business owners he had spoken to in Kerikeri and Waipapa were facing increases of 30-40 per cent.
While the council was required to carry out three-yearly valuations, Fenton said it could have opted for a zero overall rates increase, and could change the rate it charged on land value.
He also wanted the council to reduce its commercial differential of 2.75 times what is paid on residential properties.