Northern Advocate
  • Northern Advocate home
  • Latest news
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Sport
  • Property
  • Video
  • Death notices
  • Classifieds

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • On The Up
  • Business
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology
  • Sport
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Residential property listings

Locations

  • Far North
  • Kaitaia
  • Kaikohe
  • Bay of Islands
  • Whangārei
  • Kaipara
  • Mangawhai
  • Dargaville

Media

  • Video
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-Editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

Weather

  • Kaitaia
  • Whangārei
  • Dargaville

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / Northern Advocate

Northland man says he is unjustly in custody and is not who the State claims

Sarah Curtis
Sarah Curtis
Multimedia Journalist·Northern Advocate·
19 Apr, 2022 07:00 AM4 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save
    Share this article
Northland man Jay Maui Wallace claims he is being unlawfully detained at Ngawha Prison because he is not answerable to the State or the courts. Photo / Tania Whyte

Northland man Jay Maui Wallace claims he is being unlawfully detained at Ngawha Prison because he is not answerable to the State or the courts. Photo / Tania Whyte

A man's claim he is being unlawfully detained in prison because he is "not who overt or covert agents of the State say he is", has been rejected by the Court of Appeal.

Maui Warahi, also known as Jay Maui Wallace, is one of numerous defendants around the country who regularly assert only a corporate version of themselves is answerable to authority – that their physical being should be allowed to walk free.

Wallace is on remand in custody at Northland Region Corrections Facility for charges of breaching a protection order, common assault, threatening to kill, and injuring with intent to injure. He is scheduled to appear in Whangārei District Court on April 27.

Last November he applied unsuccessfully to the High Court for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of his detention. Justice Timothy Brewer rejected the application as invalid, noting Maui failed to allege any specific unlawfulness.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Maui's application to have the Court of Appeal review the High Court's decision was also rejected.

In its recently-released decision, the Appeal Court said it was satisfied Maui had been lawfully detained in accordance with warrants covering periods from last October to March this year, and one issued in relation to the current charges by a judge in Whangārei in February this year.

It was up to Maui to show otherwise.

The dual persona theory Maui relied on was untenable and without legal foundation, the Appeal Court said. Courts have consistently rejected the argument.

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Notwithstanding, it was still commonly raised in applications of habeas corpus and in a variety of other legal contexts. Maui has tried to raise it in a number of his past cases, the Appeal Court noted.

In 2016, Wallace made a similar application to the High Court saying his correct name was Abdullah Maui Warahi and that the person described as Jay Maui Wallace was not a legal entity. A judge at that time noted it was Wallace's third application for a writ of habeas corpus with Wallace having also unsuccessfully appealed at least one of them.

In the latest case, the Appeal Court said the belief shared by Wallace and others stems from the Sovereign Citizen movement, an ideology that emerged in the United States in the 1970s.

Proponents believe individuals have two personas – one of flesh and blood, the other a separate legal or "corporate" personality.

Discover more

Familiar face at Whangārei courthouse retires after five decades

29 Apr 05:00 PM
New Zealand|crime

'A nano-second': Elderly driver sentenced after motorcyclist killed

13 May 06:00 AM
New Zealand|crime

Retiree's $100k claim a 'wildly inaccurate' assessment of damages due

16 May 08:52 PM
Crime

Legal aid lawyers getting a pay rise, debt repayment to be made easier

29 May 06:00 PM

They say only that legal or corporate identity is subject to jurisdiction of the state and that their physical being can be disassociated and freed – that the state has no authority over their physical persona.

Maui supported his Appeal Court application with a document he called "Affidavit of Identity".

In it, he stated his name Jay Maui Wallace and any other derivative of it, was a "dead fictitious foreign situs trust or quasi corporation/legal entity not the sovereign soul flesh and blood man that I am".

"That I am a free will flesh and blood suri juris sovereign man and as such I am private, non resident, non domestic, non person, non citizen, non individual and not subject to any real or imaginary statutory acts, rules regulations or quasi laws.

"That I am who I say that I am NOT who the overt or covert agents of the State say that I am.

"That I do not knowingly, willingly, intentionally, or voluntarily surrender my sovereign inalienable rights according to the law of nature."

Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

The state has no legal jurisdiction or sovereign authority over him and it was up to the complainant to bring the correct parties before the courts, Maui said.

The Appeal Court said acts of Parliament, including criminal enactments, were binding on everyone in New Zealand and the Courts of New Zealand must uphold those Acts, the Crimes Act 1961 being one of them.

"The courts have the power to deal with all actions that may amount to criminal offences in this country. Nobody within New Zealand is able to dissociate themselves from their "legal persona" so as to remove themselves from the jurisdiction of the courts," the court said.

Save
    Share this article

Latest from Northern Advocate

Premium
Opinion

Joe Bennett: Game of escape – the battle to catch a runaway dog

12 Sep 05:00 PM
Northern Advocate

Chris Bishop flags Northland housing crisis, expressway progress

12 Sep 05:00 PM
Premium
Northern Advocate

'They've saved the day for us': Regional media firm, 20 jobs rescued by local identity

12 Sep 09:55 AM

Sponsored

Kiwi campaign keeps on giving

07 Sep 12:00 PM
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from Northern Advocate

Premium
Premium
Joe Bennett: Game of escape – the battle to catch a runaway dog
Opinion

Joe Bennett: Game of escape – the battle to catch a runaway dog

COMMENT: Armed with cheese, the woman tried and failed to outwit her runaway pet.

12 Sep 05:00 PM
Chris Bishop flags Northland housing crisis, expressway progress
Northern Advocate

Chris Bishop flags Northland housing crisis, expressway progress

12 Sep 05:00 PM
Premium
Premium
'They've saved the day for us': Regional media firm, 20 jobs rescued by local identity
Northern Advocate

'They've saved the day for us': Regional media firm, 20 jobs rescued by local identity

12 Sep 09:55 AM


Kiwi campaign keeps on giving
Sponsored

Kiwi campaign keeps on giving

07 Sep 12:00 PM
NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • The Northern Advocate e-edition
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Subscribe to the Northern Advocate
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The Northern Advocate
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP