Northland Regional Council has used Stephen Purvis as a warning to all farmers of the consequences of what will happen if they fail to comply in even the most minor respect. This is a bit rich coming from one of our local councils considering Whangarei District Council's long history of
Editorial: Fine by NRC is a bit rich
By Loren Duffy
Northern Advocate·
2 mins to read
Subscribe to listen
Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber? Sign in here
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
To bring the article regarding Mr Purvis's prosecution into perspective, the discharge Mr Purvis has been penalised for was an accidental spillage following heavy rain which had washed weed into a sump resulting in a blocked drain.
The "unnamed tributary" was more than two kilometres to the nearest stream and would have been greatly diluted by the time it reached the boundary of the property. The actual effect on the environment is virtually non-existent.
If the NRC can fine a farmer $40,000 for a minor and unintentional transgression, why isn't the WDC held accountable?
AdvertisementAdvertise with NZME.
It's hard for local councils to gain respect when they model double standards.