A109 Light Utility Helicopter flight with mayor Gisborne City from the air in November 2023.
Opinion
In answer to a correspondent's question about proceeds from a sale of Eastland Network, your editor agrees that the Trust Tairawhiti model of building up capital and investing some of that over time in identified regional needs is better than distributing proceeds widely, and thinly, to beneficiaries.
Trust Tairawhiti could
make payouts to its beneficiaries, who are essentially all adults and businesses in the Gisborne district, one subset of which is the region's power users.
It won't, though, as much as that would be useful for many households suffering from fast-rising costs this year. There would be equity issues over sharing proceeds with long-time power users versus recent arrivals; and there would be very limited benefit in distributing proceeds to households and businesses that don't need it.
The decision back in the early 1990s to establish a community trust rather than sell the electricity network or create a consumer trust, where regular dividends are paid to power users, has proved a good one. Equity of $20m at establishment has grown more than 20x to $430m at last count a year ago.
The deed for Trust Tairawhiti is a flexible one that allows it to “provide for beneficiaries in such manner as the trustees shall from time to time decide” . . . and two years ago the trustees decided that the best use of the large amount of capital built up in the trust (over and above their requirement to “preserve the value of the capital of the trust fund”, calculated last year at $293m) was to invest $100m into regional wellbeing intitiatives by 2025.