The walls were also left with a number of large holes throughout the rental, which the tribunal found to be intentional
"I am satisfied the damage can be categorised as intentional as it has been destroyed by fire and in a very poor state of repair."
READ MORE:
• Nine Tenancy Tribunal cases involving one Hamilton landlord in 2 years, $15,000 awarded to tenants
• Death no end to debts: Tenancy Tribunal case reminder of financial obligations
• Tenancy Tribunal finding gives Rotorua landlord possession, 229 days after 90-day notice issued
• Tenancy Tribunal award $4000 over mouse-ridden Coatesville rental
Tyres, furniture and whiteware were left behind at the Tauranga rental, with a number of holes throughout the home found after Bowring left.
An extensive amount of rubbish, including tyres, furniture and whiteware, were left behind at the Tauranga rental.
The new carpet was also stained, but as the landlord admitted that they hadn't attempted to professionally clean it after Bowring's tenancy, no money was awarded for the damages.
Damage was intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose, the Tribunal noted.
Damage was also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty.
Bowring, who did not appear at the Tribunal hearing, was ordered to pay $3938.15 immediately, made up of rubbish removal, repairs, oven and stove cleaning and to replace the rangehood.