Namely it was not to touch the ears or the collar. There were weekly hair inspections during which you would be examined, if you needed a cut you would be told and you had to have it done quickly.
If you didn't then your hair would be cut at the school, in the hall. Lots of guys tested the rule and all ended up in the chair of uniformity.
One chap, however, refused to bow to the rule and the matter ended up in court where The Beak ruled in favour of the school.
His line was if you attend the school you obey the rules. All of them.
Earlier this year we had the case of Lucan Battison who objected to the hair rules at St John's College in Hawke's Bay and was suspended for his stand.
The matter went to court and Justice David Collins ruled the school's process was illegal.
He also warned that a tightening up of the rules would need to give "very special consideration" as to whether it would breach a student's rights.
Those rights, he suggested, were to "autonomy, individual dignity and his rights to freedom of expression".
Now you will need to forgive me folks, but I have to laugh when someone - even a justice - suggests that the length of someone's hair is freedom of expression.
In my opinion it does seriously take the mickey out of an important keystone of our democracy - to be able to say what you believe.
And the so-called denial of a child's rights by asking them to live within rules set by an organisation is plain ridiculous.
Children's rights are to be fed, clothed, housed, educated, loved, kept safe and not to be worked or beaten to death.
Being able to have long hair, watch TV at any hour, or be mouthy to people who support them are not rights. They are First World issues that hundreds of millions of abused children around the world would spit on from their factories, mines or refugee camps.
I reckon that the word 'rights' has evolved from meaning protecting people to just objecting to something you don't agree with.
There's an easy answer to rules issues within organisations.
If you don't like them ... don't stay.
It is easy.
St John's has just tightened its hair rules - voted in and accepted by 93 per cent of the school's parents. They will mean Lucan may need to trim his locks.
If dear fellow doesn't like the new hair rules he shouldn't go to the High Court, he should go to another school.
Until he leaves school and starts working - that is earning the right to be an individual - he needs to do as he is told.
If he doesn't like that then tough, he should learn to fit in.
---
I'm going to be heading out of the country on election day, but still wanted to have my say.
So I made a quick visit to the Electoral Commission website and checked out where I could register my vote early.
It turned out I could do so at Shop 32 in the Plaza at Papamoa and so zoomed in there on Friday. A delightful and helpful lady went through the list of names, checked mine off, gave me my form and then off I popped into the booth to make my decision.
Actually my party decision was a foregone conclusion, it was picking the candidate that gave me trouble.
Should I vote for someone I like? Someone I didn't like? Someone I barely know? A new face with lots of backing?
In the end I went with someone I knew who, I felt, would make a terrific MP.
Chances of that person getting up ... not huge, but in my view the important thing was not to be a sheep. We should think about who we are picking and vote for the person, not the party, when it comes to individual seats.
After all they will represent us.
And if we all vote for good people then the standards of Parliament will automatically be raised.
Anyway, best of luck to all who are standing.
And to fellow electors remember this - vote early.
richard@richardmoore.com
• Richard Moore is an award-winning Western Bay journalist and photographer.
