Before voting on the referendum on legalising personal use of cannabis everyone should at least read the conclusions of the recently released study Patterns of Recreational Cannabis use in Aotearoa-NZ and their Consequences, by Richie Polton.
Clearly, in my view, it supports my argument that we should be decriminalising not legalising.
This would mean that individuals caught with small amounts for personal use (less than say 200g) are given health-based help to kick the habit and /or civil sanctions (fines etc).
People caught with larger amounts, plus sellers and growers are faced with the same laws as are in place now.
This recognises the damage and harm use does to many sectors of society.
It is ridiculous we only have a yes/no option, however, by voting no it sends a strong message to politicians and most importantly we will still have decriminalisation as a future option.
A yes vote will open the doors to big business, more harm and other unknown consequences while burying any chance of a middle path (decriminalisation) that has worked well in places like Portugal.
Bruce Ingram
Pāpāmoa
The Bay of Plenty Times welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final. No correspondence will be entered into.
Email editor@bayofplentytimes.co.nz
