Rail is not that unattainable, says a reader. Photo / File
Rail is not that unattainable, says a reader. Photo / File
Kevin Ironside (Letters, September 25) quite rightly questions realistic costs in relation to passenger rail.
The ECMT rail corridor and rails already exist, thus first stage is the provision of two or four passenger rail cars in the morning, midday and afternoon time peaks.
Freight trains would use the remaining16 free hours out of 24.
Over the past 40 years rail has suffered neglect, private equity asset stripping and under-investment so some expenditure is overdue and entirely justified.
Rail is generally less cost and quicker to lay than road construction. (Bombed out rail tracks were renewed overnight in WWII).
It is more prudent to spend a few million on a permanent rail infrastructure than persist with total road dependence/congestion which pollutes and mostly puffs out fumes every day.
How sensible is wasting $665 million on proven flawed roading transportation, predictably leading to repeat Auckland's disaster?
I bet she's a hypocrite and owns a laptop and a cellphone.
I am going to throw the biggest hissy fit if she's awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Lesley Haddon Rotorua
Greta Thunberg applauded
Your correspondent, Mr P Weren (Letters, September 26) appears to have joined a growing number of Greta Thunberg detractors around the globe.
One wonders why does this impassioned young 16-year-old girl makes older people feel uncomfortable or threatened?
All she is really asking is that we listen to the science. According to a UN panel of scientists, climate change is devastating our seas and frozen regions as never before.
Waters are rising, the ice is melting, and species are moving habitat and dying due to human activities.
The earth has already warmed about 1C since the Industrial Revolution, and science suggests that we must avoid 1.5C of warming to avoid widespread damage and suffering.
In my view, Greta Thunberg is to be applauded, as are the students and other thinking people who marched yesterday to raise awareness of climate change.
Young people are only too aware that when we older people have shuffled off this mortal coil, they - our grandchildren and great-grandchildren - will be the ones who suffer.
Jackie Evans Rotorua
Teen's impassioned plea
To suggest that Greta Thunberg was being over-dramatic is an insult to a very brave and intelligent young person.
It has been more than 30 years since scientists raised concerns about global warming and its climatic impacts.
When the UN formed an international scientific body in 1988 to investigate and provide advice on the issue, it was named the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
It was recognised even then that the major issue was not global warming alone, but the likelihood that it would increase the severity and frequency of major climatic events.
Since then, the IPCC has issued increasingly stark warnings about ignoring the impacts of climate change, but because of short-term thinking and self-interest world leaders and industrial giants have failed to act.
We now have reached a point where the scientists' grim forecasts of 30 years ago are being confirmed, as increasingly frequent and severe climate events are causing death and destruction around the world.
Greta Thunberg, therefore, has every right to feel affronted that politicians and industry leaders have neglected to act over the past 30 years, leaving her generation to bear the brunt of the changes that will occur over this century.
If it takes an impassioned plea from someone like her to belatedly shake the world into action, that can only be a good thing.
Keith Garratt Rotorua
The Bay of Plenty Times welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
