(Abridged)
Russell Wenn
Oropi Downs
Who then is left to do the killing?
Ester Richards (Letters, November 11) in my opinion gives us a simplistic view of the End of Life Choice Bill, much of which is still highly disputed.
For instance, she fails to mention the international experience of the slippery slope and those patients who want to change their minds at the point of administering fatal overdose.
Nowhere in our tradition of common law do we allow anyone to take the life or another citizen.
The New Zealand medical profession is almost entirely opposed to this Bill.
Who then is left to do the killing?
A G Stewart
Pyes Pa
The Bay of Plenty Times welcomes letters from readers. Please note the following:
• Letters should not exceed 200 words.
• They should be opinion based on facts or current events.
• If possible, please email.
• No noms-de-plume.
• Letters will be published with names and suburb/city.
• Please include full name, address and contact details for our records only.
• Local letter writers given preference.
• Rejected letters are not normally acknowledged.
• Letters may be edited, abridged, or rejected at the Editor's discretion.
• The Editor's decision on publication is final.
Email editor@bayofplentytimes.co.nz or write to the Editor, Bay of Plenty Times, Private Bag, Tauranga
