In my view these few residents are unfair as people who litter streets or discharge effluent into the harbour.
Such is their belief in their rights over the environment.
If residents of Cherrywood dislike trees why choose to live there? Wouldn't a new subdivision be more appropriate?
To those whingeing about seeds, are we so lazy that we cannot sweep? To those with allergies, there is a chemist in Cherrywood that can sell you antihistamine.
If residents were allergic to dogs, would the council's animal committee approve a mass slaughter?
Alarmingly, the council is flouting the advice of the city arborist who says there is no reason for those trees - or the Papamoa pines - to be removed.
Felling them is inconsistent with tree policy. Rather than accept his expertise, the subcommittee is reviewing rules on removal of street trees.
Do not underestimate how this subcommittee could devastate the city's landscape. Once trees are gone, we can't get them back.
I will be voting for a councillor who understands the importance of a city's tree stock, who sets policies for proper tree maintenance and who plans for a tree-lined future.