This is hardly the behaviour of someone who wants to keep the job.
He manifestly spends little time concerning himself with dealing with the virus and its deadly progress. He can't seem to focus on what he should be doing; his press briefings on the subject are perfunctory and do not include his senior adviser on the subject, Dr Fauci.
He seems to have lost interest in the subject altogether.
He offers no strategy for dealing with the pandemic, other than assuring people that, contrary to all the evidence, it will "go away".
The economy is in an unprecedented nosedive as case numbers and deaths multiply.
His one positive reaction to the crisis is that he has suggested that the election should be delayed and has warned that the high numbers of postal votes, necessitated by the virus, will mean that the election result will be the least reliable in history and will be vitiated by fraud.
He has refused to give any assurance that he would accept the result if he loses.
What conclusion does all this suggest?
My thesis is that he is not only resigned to losing the election but would actually welcome that outcome.
Here, I believe, is someone who knows he is out of his depth, on the issue of the virus and on everything else - who is not enjoying the job, and has a sense that it is all beyond him, who would be glad to have the immediate burden of dealing with the pandemic removed from him and for others to have to shoulder it.
If, as I suspect, this is the case, what then is his priority? It is not to win the election, since that would mean that all the burdens and responsibilities would come crashing and crushing back down on him for another four years.
No, his main objective would be to escape the burden of a further term but to do so without having to accept that he had been rejected by the voters, which would be a serious blow to his ego and to his place in history.
He has always been a President whose ego is much greater than his ability.
His inaction and ineffectiveness in dealing with the virus have simply illustrated and exemplified a much wider truth, which is his overall unfitness for the job - it is a truth of which he cannot, however self-deluded, be unaware and that will weigh increasingly heavily on him.
So, if he is resigned to, or would welcome, losing, his focus would be on salvaging what he can of his reputation, which requires him to be able to say, as he hands over the reins to his successful rival, that it was not a fair contest and that he lost only because his opponents cheated.
This interpretation may be regarded as fanciful but it at least makes sense of the two apparently contradictory elements in his behaviour - contradictory, that is, if he is really trying to win.
There is, first, his manifest lack of interest in being seen to deal effectively with the pandemic, something he must know is the pre-condition of getting himself re-elected.
And secondly, there is his deliberate attempt to undermine the electoral process and his unwillingness to accept its outcome, an attitude that opens him up to the criticism that to re-elect him would be to empower someone prepared to threaten democracy - a perception that cannot help his chances of appealing to voters.
Watch this space.
- Bryan Gould is an ex-British MP and former University of Waikato vice-chancellor.
