Tom said the teams arguments were based around not valuing one persons life over another.
"The debate wasn't clear whether it was just for illegal substances so we challenged that with how that would be implemented." Caleb spoke about the value of a life saying everyone deserves a second chance, that was our common theme.
Spencer said the team also brought up other arguments such as how food could be an abused substance.
"So it was a very fine line to draw about what substance abuse was."
Spencer said he enjoyed debating because it gave him an adrenalin rush.
Tom said debating was a way for him to be able to argue a point of view and it challenged his opinions on subjects.
The trio said they wanted an opportunity to work together in a team rather than competing against each other.
All three had ambitions to be politicians.
Bethlehem College debating co-ordinator Jan Dean said the three were extremely argumentative but knew how to channel their skills into debating.
The 19 school teams from Bethlehem College, Tauranga Girls College, Tauranga Boys College, Otumoetai College, Papamoa College and Katikati College, spent Saturday preparing up to five debates and being judged on their arguments.