The Bay of Plenty District Health Board was found to underfund Avastin treatments.
The health board says having the same prioritisations criteria used in all health boards around the country would help ensure fairness to access to Avastin.
It is hard to understand why, in a country as small as New Zealand, such significant differences in publicly funded treatments exist.
Surely, if you are assessed to meet the criteria for public funding in one region, you should still qualify if you choose to live somewhere else.
The fact that this is not the case points to a randomness that should not, in my view, exist in the health system.
It also raises the question of why individual health boards come to different conclusions about the level of funding required for certain conditions in the first place.
Shouldn't there be some uniformity in this area?
Surely you can't be less in need because you choose to live in Tauranga and not, say, Timaru?
Funding priorities should be set at a national level to avoid these inconsistencies, which can have devastating consequences for patients such as Mr Marsh.