In 1885, the English surgeon Frederick Treves gave a series of talks at the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Treves' most famous moment in abdominal history - treating Edward VII, a few days prior to the king's coronation, by draining an abscess in the royal appendix - would come decades later.

But even by the late 19th century Treves was known among his peers as an expert of the guts. He spoke at length to his fellow doctors about the digestive tract, having examined it in a hundred or so cadavers.

The medical field was receptive to his findings. It remained so. As recently as 2008, textbooks like the 40th edition of Gray's Anatomy echoed descriptions that Treves presented in his lectures.

Advertisement

But Treves' research contained an error that persisted for more than a century, wrote a pair of scientists in the Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology journal, published in November but spotted by the Independent: Treves neglected to give the mesentery, a double sheet of connective tissue that curls through the abdomen, the importance it deserved.

Treves declared that the mesentery existed only sporadically, in disjointed ribbons, dispersed among the intestines. That was not so, the researchers wrote in the new report.

"The anatomic description that had been laid down over 100 years of anatomy was incorrect. This organ is far from fragmented and complex," said Calvin Coffey, a study author and surgeon at the University of Limerick, Ireland, in a statement. "It is simply one continuous structure."

The mesentery, argued the scientists from University of Limerick, Ireland, was not separate sections of connective wrap. As a single entity, it could be classified as an organ.

By most counts, tissues of the human body are lumped into 78 organs. The mesentery, then, would be number 79.

"We are now saying we have an organ in the body which hasn't been acknowledged as such to date," Coffey said.

Next to the thumping heart and the brain's enigmatic mass, the mesentery may seem a humble thing. It is a fatty membrane that holds the intestines in place. Though the classification as an organ is new, the mesentery itself is not a contemporary discovery; what appears to be the mesentery can be seen in a drawing by Leonardo da Vinci.

The metaphors the mesentery inspires are a far cry from stomach butterflies or broken hearts. If you were to imagine the guts as dress fabric, as 19th century physician Worthington Hooker did in his book Human Physiology, the mesentery would be a ruffle encircling the the "puffed edging" of the intestines.

Without the mesentery, though, bound on one end to the backbone, the intestines would slop around in the belly. Coffey and his colleagues confirmed the mesentery was continuous, stretching from the rectum to the small intestine at the base of the stomach, in a series of studies in 2012 and 2014. After revealing its structure, the scientists argued they had enough evidence to "justify designation of the mesentery as an organ". Coffey went as far as to argue life without the mesentery is impossible - "without it you can't live," he said to Discover Magazine.

If there existed a scientific organisation charged with naming the organs, it was unclear even to surgeons like Coffey. "I actually don't know who the final arbiter of that is," he told Discover; But, typically, anatomists classify organs not only by their continuity but also by a common function. The complete function of the mesentery remains a mystery.