John Armstrong 's Opinion

John Armstrong is the Herald's chief political commentator

John Armstrong: Greens stretch credibility with referendum cost

276 comments
Greens co-leader Russel Norman. Photo / Getty Images
Greens co-leader Russel Norman. Photo / Getty Images

The week's prize for barefaced cheek must surely go to the Greens.

With Parliament's Clerk of the House yesterday finally giving the okay for a non-binding referendum on National's asset sales policy, the Greens listed the costs to the taxpayer so far of the Government's partial privatisation programme.

Included in the total, which the Greens estimate as close to $125 million, was $9 million to pay for the referendum.

That sum is certainly a cost the Government has to meet. But it is a cost forced on the Government by virtue of the successful efforts of the Greens and the other Opposition parties.

The logic for citing this as a Government-imposed cost on the taxpayer was that the referendum was only being held because National has an asset sales policy.

On that basis, the Greens should have included the nearly $50,000 in taxpayer-provided money drawn from its parliamentary funding to pay eight staff to collect signatures for the petition needed to force the referendum.

The Greens might have been better advised to have been upfront about the cost of the referendum as being the justified price of democracy, rather than trying to hang financial responsibility for the ballot on the Government.

However, the sleight of hand might be designed to deflect criticism that by the time the referendum is held, the partial floats of up to 49 per cent of the three state-owned electricity generators - Mighty River Power, Meridian Energy and Genesis Energy - will be close to completion and therefore a plebiscite is a waste of money. John Key was certainly trying to pin that charge on Opposition parties yesterday.

That the ground is starting to shift from under the Opposition was apparent in those parties' calls for the asset sales programme to be halted immediately until a referendum can be held. There was fat chance of National agreeing to that.

There is another risk for the Opposition in the referendum losing its relevance - that voter turnout is consequently low, enabling National to claim victory in likely defeat.

The smart thing for the Opposition to do would be to forgo the referendum and earn kudos for saving taxpayers $9 million. The politics are likely to get in the way of that happening, however.

- NZ Herald

John Armstrong

John Armstrong is the Herald's chief political commentator

Herald political correspondent John Armstrong has been covering politics at a national level for nearly 30 years. Based in the Press Gallery at Parliament in Wellington, John has worked for the Herald since 1987. John was named Best Columnist at the 2013 Canon Media Awards and was a previous winner of Qantas media awards as best political columnist. Prior to joining the Herald, John worked at Parliament for the New Zealand Press Association. A graduate of Canterbury University's journalism school, John began his career in journalism in 1981 on the Christchurch Star. John has a Masters of Arts degree in political science from Canterbury.

Read more by John Armstrong

Have your say

We aim to have healthy debate. But we won't publish comments that abuse others. View commenting guidelines.

1200 characters left

Sort by
  • Oldest

© Copyright 2014, APN New Zealand Limited

Assembled by: (static) on red akl_a5 at 03 Sep 2014 00:25:10 Processing Time: 776ms