Former superyacht builder Ivan Erceg has once again been denied a look at who got what from two trusts set up by his older brother, the late liquor magnate Michael Erceg.
Ivan received no payout when the trusts were wound up in 2010, some 10 months after he was declared bankrupt.
Four years on - out of bankruptcy and armed with a Queen's Counsel - Ivan Valdimir Joseph Erceg marched to the High Court to get his hands on a swathe of trust records.
The documents in his sights included financial statements of Independent Liquor, the ready-to-drink beverage company founded by his brother and worth an estimated $620 million when he died in a helicopter crash a decade ago.
Opposing the bid were two trustees, lawyer Darryl Gregory and Michael's widow Lynette Erceg.
But it was not to be and the High Court's Justice Pamela Courtney said Ivan's main complaint seemed to be that he had not received any distribution from the trust assets.
The "weight of the evidence", she said, was that Michael had intended the trusts would be administered in confidence and he did not want his family members who might benefit from them to have information on this.
While Justice Courtney said she would have exercised her discretion and declined to order the disclosure Ivan sought, she did not need to as she found he did not have the standing to bring the action in the first place.
He took the matter to the Court of Appeal, which disagreed with Justice Courtney and believed the former boss of the now-sunk Sensation Yachts did have standing to bring the case.
But unfortunately for Ivan, the end result was the same.
"[Justice Courtney] fairly considered the factors in favour of and against disclosure before determining no disclosure was appropriate," said the appellate judges, who found their High Court counterpart did not err in her conclusion to refuse his bid.
Could the defeat now spell Ivan's retreat from this fractious family fight?
His mother and sister-in-law have already buried the hatchet and litigation between them has been called off, as Business Insider revealed last year.
Ivan could not be tracked down yesterday for comment.
Indian restaurant chain founder
Rupinder Singh Chahil
will have to have his financial affairs probed in front of a High Court judge if he is aiming to get out of bankruptcy.
The 43-year-old has already endured more than three years of insolvency, after which one is normally free to return to commercial life.
However, the Official Assignee - which manages personal insolvencies - has opposed his automatic discharge from bankruptcy, meaning he will now face a High Court examination.
No date has been set for this, an OA spokeswoman said this week.
This is not Chahil's only battle with authorities.
He is also defending Immigration New Zealand charges alleging he supplied misleading information.
As well as this, he is the target of an investigation by Inland Revenue, which believes he was involved in evading the assessment and payment of tax by systematically stripping cash from the Masala chain
Chahil was not a target of police freezing orders, in which $34 million of assets with links to the Masala restaurants was restrained in December.
However, the restaurater is believed to live at one of the 33 frozen properties, a $1.7 million home in Howick.
In IRD's sights
The taxman is circling a company run by Hamish James Clarke, the elusive property developer whose firms failed last year owing more than $6 million.
Liquidators have struggled to track down Clarke, who last September was believed to be in Europe.
Valiant Homes had been working on 13 building sites in Auckland but went into liquidation and receivership last March.
The taxman is circling a company run by Hamish James Clarke, the elusive property developer.
SHARE THIS QUOTE:
It owed more than $4 million, with suppliers and other unsecured creditors claiming more than $1 million of that amount.
Other companies Clarke directed have also gone under and the Inland Revenue could tip another - VH Projects Six - into liquidation. The taxman's bid to do so will come before the High Court next Friday.
Business Insider will be betting against Clarke turning up for that event.