Stamping out cyber crimes

Few would dispute the benefits of technological advancement but, like so many silver linings, there is the inevitable cloud.

Such is the case with fast-paced mass communication enabled by the internet and mobile phone technologies. The pluses are numerous and cut across business applications and our personal lives. The biggest downside would arguably be the advent of cyber-bullying.

It is insidious, dangerous and invasive. It takes many forms, from angry emails, text messages, social media postings and even the manufacturing of specific websites and pages to attack and demean targeted individuals.

A campaign by the Chronicle's stablemate the New Zealand Herald threw a spotlight on the problem, focusing on cases such as that involving Wanganui schoolgirl Robin de Jong, who was filmed being kicked unconscious by a classmate, who was later expelled.

Prime Minister John Key asked the Law Commission to fast-track its report looking at ways of reducing harm caused by cyber-bullying.

It has long been acknowledged as a problem, with numerous cases of serious harm, even death, as a result. Many have pondered what to do about it and sought urgent action.

The worry, of course, is that too restrictive a response will inhibit people's ability to make the best use of the positive aspects of technology. And many might argue that existing laws were sufficient to protect against inciting violence or other displays of hatred. But there are gaps, and now it seems action is at hand to close them.

Among Law Commission recommendations were that a new criminal offence be created for harmful digital communication, such as inciting suicide, bullying, or publishing intimate photographs without consent.

The commission also suggested the establishment of a government agency to hear complaints and order offensive material removed from the web.

Sensible stuff, that should be acted upon with urgency.