Four councillors opposed the move at the 10-year plan deliberations - and they had a point, though not one based on racial matters. The four opposers were told that closer liaison with iwi would help "maximise the benefits" of what could be $200million in Treaty settlements.
That is true, and a healthy and respectful working relationship with local Maori is vitally important for our district.
But hard information about just where the money would go and what exactly it would be spent on was in short supply.
Rather the expenditure was wrapped up in woolly platitudes. That does no one any favours - especially iwi.
Council already invests in an iwi liaison committee to further such matters, and a good relationship can be formed without spending a dime.
No matter the sensitivity of the topic, council needs to be able to state clearly just what it is spending ratepayers' money on.