It could be argued that there is no comparison between Switzerland and New Zealand in terms of attracting top talent. But please refer to argument (a): Paying top whack to counter other deficiencies here doesn't appear to have brought blue-ribbon performance. And it is our state organisations, in particular, which seem to have fallen for this line.
Take Solid Energy. In a piece of digging worthy of a miner, Campbell Live told us on Monday in the 12 years from 2000 the SOE went from employing 23 people on a salary more than $100,000 to employing 472 people earning more than $100,000. That is not a typo.
The top salary in those years went from $190,000 to $1.34 million. That huge bump in salaries went hand-in-hand with a $389 million loss and the loss of hundreds of jobs.
Again, the argument that New Zealand has to pay top wages and bonuses to get the skills to run our enterprises seems asinine.
As dairy farmers grappled with a high dollar and falling prices, was the head of Fonterra really worth the $8.2 million he pocketed when he left last year? It's only fair to mention the Swiss action is not aimed at a super-successful dairy company, it's aimed at the banks and finance companies. But somewhere along the line, expectations for all chief executives have to be tempered.
The Swiss have realised we are in a different era. Let's hope the contract drawn up with the next Ministry of Education secretary doesn't make the mistakes of the last.