It was his decision to allow seabed mining to go ahead.
That decision went against the wishes of the people who live in the affected area, the people who are protesting and putting a legitimate case against the mining proposal. To suggest their petitions and submissions were taken into account before the decision was made is, in the vernacular, bollocks. The decision was political.
It was made by a committee appointed by an agency run by a Government which has systematically withdrawn funding from environmental protection and conservation.
That decision was a foregone conclusion despite the well-paid months the committee sat and pondered.
The promises of jobs and local prosperity, even if true, mean nothing in comparison with the environmental damage to the region and the pillage of valuable breeding grounds.
But who is listening?