QUITE what was in the Government's mind when it framed the amendments to the Local Government Act that are currently under debate, I am not sure.
But its proposal to transfer local council assets into a body that is not accountable to the ratepayers or the elected representatives has stirredup a hornet's nest of opposition.
It is not just that councils such as Whanganui are against it; it is not just that Local Government New Zealand is against it; it is not just that Government support parties such as United Future are against it ... even the Minister in charge is agin' it!
According to Whanganui mayor Annette Main, Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga has said that if the legislation is passed he will resign as Minister for Local Government, a position he has only held for nine months.
There is something slightly sinister over proposals that even the Minister reckons do not stand up to scrutiny.
Local council assets are many and, in some cases, they are very valuable. Certainly, managing them successfully is a challenge but it is not one that should be removed from local accountability. The citizens of any district have a right to be in control of their own destinies - even if it is only through the ballot box every three years.
The amendments would allow central government to place local council assets into an organisation not accountable to the council. That is far too heavy-handed and it is likely to bite the dust.
There is already provision for central government intervention in local affairs in times of dire need; there is the Auditor-General and the power to appoint commissioners. That is sufficient.
