Now in Thursday's Age I note that only the property owners had a right to vote. What about the business owners that occupy these properties?
It is going to impact a lot more on them than the owners of said properties, as no doubt all costs will be added to their rates demands, and they have been given no right to vote on something that will have an added cost to their business. Since the results of the ballot were announced I have received no information as to the real cost to us for this 'project,' except for reading the average cost per property will be roughly $200 per annum.
Now stop right there: $200 times approximately 300 properties, to me adds up to roughly $60,000.
Not the budget of $23,000 as mentioned by Mr Phillips.
Is the balance of approximately $37,000 going to be eaten up on administration costs?
I know I am not the only property and/ or business owner in this situation of not being approached personally, of not being sent any details, or of not receiving voting papers, and am far from convinced this proposal and ballot was done fairly and in a correct manner.
Throw away any percentages; the vote by my calculations was close to 44 for, 41 against, out of the supposed approximate 300 property owners.
ANGRY AND DISILLUSIONED PROPERTY/BUSINESS OWNER
Kaitaia
PS: I would love some feedback either for or against this project.