Making a section 23 to 71 square metres smaller than the minimum size for a residential zone, is a lot smaller. Families will still be living in tight spaces, with little privacy.
I wonder if I would get consent for this non-compliant development, if I was the applicant? Or do we ignore the standards just because the applicant is Kāinga Ora and they have a mandate to build?
Three massive homes on this section is too many. Scale it back so one or two families can live well, not three families packed in. Careful design and consultation now might save us watching another Kāinga Ora home get demolished, 20 years down the track.
And who, exactly, has the authority to declare the adverse effects of this development are “less than minor”? Do they live in this neighbourhood? Will they be affected? Who could reasonably state this without checking in with the neighbours and asking what they think?
If Kāinga Ora is serious about their mission to set people up to thrive, they would start consulting neighbourhoods, regardless of it being a mandatory requirement or not. It’s called respect.
Lisa Christensen