Limited licences were expensive (about $1500 plus GST) and were more restrictive. A disqualification period would also apply until it was granted, Ms Tunstall said.
Clapperton's previous similar offences were many years ago. He could be treated as a first offender. He was a solo father who relied on his employment as his only source of income. He had limited family help, and would struggle to meet his child's needs if unable to drive, Ms Tunstall said.
Judge Cathcart said his ruling in Clapperton's favour was by a thin margin. The 22-year gap since Clapperton's last offence and his obligations as a sole parent were the strongest deciding factors.
While Clapperton had not driven recklessly or carelessly, by driving while intoxicated he had inherently endangered his child passenger. It also threw doubt on Clapperton's claim he had matured and put this kind of offending behind him, the judge said.