He said by that stage the council had not met the requirements of its resource consent for any year since the plant opened, odour complaints were still being received, and operating costs for the plant - mainly for electricity - were much higher than expected.
In response to a question from Councillor Michael Laws, Mr Hughes said he understood that councillors had never been made aware of Cardno BTO's report.
Mr Hughes told councillors there were four possible designs for the council's wastewater treatment plant but that the council and its design partner, MWH, had chosen none of them.
"It appeared to MWH and
D-Day in war on stench
that plagues our city
CRUNCH TIME: Wanganui District Council's infrastructure manager, Mark Hughes, at yesterday's extraordinary council meeting to discuss the future of the wastewater treatment plant.PHOTO/STUART MUNRO council staff that it should be possible to identify the most desirable features of all the options and put these together," he said.
"This design was untried until we tried it."
Mr Hughes said the system did not work because it attempted to put aerated and non-aerated layers of waste in the one pond. A further problem was that waste was not being adequately treated by the system.
He said the council needed to find out whether the problems with the plant could ever be fixed.
"That's what we will be asking Cardno BTO to find out. We need to examine if the plant can ever be made compliant, and if so, how."
He said the timeframe for that was three months. The cost would come from within existing wastewater budgets.
The recommendation was that the council commission Cardno BTO to provide a future options report that includes:
Any additional measures that can be taken to address odour
To determine whether it is viable to continue with the plant
If viable, which options to achieve satisfactory performance are available for completion over the next two years
If not viable, then establish which type of plant would be suitable for Wanganui's waste
And that the report is peer reviewed by an agency that is independent of the wastewater treatment plant project.
The recommendation was moved unanimously.