Councillor Gary Caffell said at Wednesday's council meeting he was disappointed in the council for not considering the club's unanimous decision of where the stations should go.
"I just want to voice a little bit of disappointment in terms of the decisions with the fitness stations," he said.
He had previously warned the council the club would withdraw their offer if their preferred option was not agreed to.
He said it was unfair that a club letter written to deputy mayor Jane Terpstra outlining this, was not presented at the last meeting while the recommendation from a landscape architect supporting the council's preference for Option A was also not discussed.
"What wasn't brought to the meeting was a letter from Rotary Club ... which set out very plainly they would not consider Option A at all," said Mr Caffell.
"It was unanimous that all members preferred that site."
Mrs Terpstra said councillors were aware of the club's stance. "I said it was clearly indicated that it was their preferred site," she said.
Councillor Pip Hannon said she believed the club had originally agreed to let council decide on the site.
"At the very beginning when we were first discussing it, we were given the option to chose," she said.
"We all had our specific reasons why we chose that site."
Mayor Garry Daniell said the matter was closed and the decision had been made.
"The reality is we've actually passed the motion.
"This was approved and that really is the end of that matter," he said.
Rotary Club community director Ian Hollings confirmed the club had received the letter from council and would meet next week to further discuss the issue.
