Henderson "strongly refutes" this and opposed any order for the liquidator to deliver the electronic files. He argued the OA had previously received and viewed the information and that such an "order would be unfair, oppressive and an abuse of the Assignee's power as it would be fishing exercise".
He also opposed any order where the OA would "quarantine" personal documents to protect his privacy and said these documents should not retained but returned to him.
In his decision this week, Associate Judge Osborne said the liquidator was to deliver the OA a copy of an external hard drive and of flash drives which had data from Henderson's laptop.
Read the full court document here:
However, the judge attached certain conditions on this and said that any documents the OA accepts are of a "purely personal nature" should be sent to Henderson and, when receives them, they are to be deleted.
Associate Judge also said the OA was entitled to require Henderson deliver up documents "relating to his property, conduct or dealings", although this was also subject to certain conditions.