Associate Maori Affairs minister Tariana Turia is to be given a stern warning by the Prime Minister to keep her opinions about "the Maori holocaust" and colonisation to herself.
Failure to follow the advice will jeopardise Mrs Turia's future as a minister.
Mrs Turia will also have future speeches vetted by one of the Prime Minister's staffers, probably Heather Simpson, Helen Clark's closest political adviser.
What did the minister actually say to cause such consternation?
Here is the full text of the speech by the Hon. Tariana Turia, to the NZ Psychological Society Conference 2000 at Waikato University on Tuesday 29 August 2000.
The text is as supplied by Mrs Turia's office.
* * *
Tena tatau e hui nei i tenei ra. Tena koutou nga rangatira o Waikato. Nga mihi ki a koutou a ki Te Ata-i- rangikaahu hoki. Tena tatau katoa.
Thank you for inviting me to speak at this conference. Over the last week or so, such has been the activity over what I have been purported to have said or done, I have at times questioned the nature of truth.
I also questioned hearing, listening and memory.
Indeed I was tempted to seek wise counsel and I did think of this gathering this week and the thought did enter my head, that a psychologist just might come in handy.
I dismissed the thought very quickly!
I realised that the best counsellors for me are the very supportive whanau I am fortunate to have.
A whanau, who in times when my spirit needs nurturing I can always turn to. I am also always able to tap the resource of the memories and guidance of those who have passed on, to give me solace and to uplift me.
It is this whanau of whom I am a member which nurtures and sustains me.
It is this whanau which is also a part of the iwi of Whanganui, Ngati Apa, Nga Rauru and Tuwharetoa who are responsible for my identity, responsible for the security that I have in knowing who I am.
What my whanau are not able to provide I will seek in the hapu and iwi. I have numerous choices.
We all know the social structures of whanau, hapu and iwi are responsible for both cultural reproduction and identity.
All of you here know these same social structures have demonstrated amazing resilience as sites of resistance to colonisation, but, which as you also know, have been seriously weakened.
Given what I have just said you just might have realised that what I wish to address with you today is the phenomenon of colonisation and some thoughts on what the implications may be for psychology.
I know Tariana Turia and "colonisation" always attracts attention.
I seek not personal attention. I just want us to consider our history as a country and consider how this history has affected the indigenous people, how this history has impacted on Maori whanau, hapu and iwi.
I really do believe that mature, intelligent New Zealanders of all races are capable of the analysis of the trauma of one group of people suffering from the behaviour of another.
I can see the connections between 'home invasions' which concern many of us, to the invasion of the 'home lands' of indigenous people by a people from another land.
What I have difficulty in reconciling is how 'home invasions' emits such outpourings of concern for the victims and an intense despising of the invaders while the invasion of the 'home lands' of Maori does not engender the same level of emotion and concern for the Maori victims.
I wonder why that is?
A double standard seems to be working here, you as psychologists I am confident will be able to identify and label the double standard.
With personal identity inextricably tied to whanau, hapu and iwi identity, indigenous people still have to counter the problems of the conspiracy of alienation, assimilation and deculturation launched against them well over a century ago.
I have been accused in Parliament in the past week of indulging in "sociological clap trap" when linking colonisation to family violence.
I can now imagine after this speech that I will be accused of indulging in 'psychological clap trap'.
I may look to you to defend me against such scurrilous attacks. I suppose I should be grateful the house is not sitting.
What I need to say however that as psychologists you frequently have as your clients, Maori people.
The challenge I put to you is - Do you seriously believe that you, with the training that you get, are able to nurture the Maori psyche, are you able to see in to the soul of the people and attend to the wounded spirit?
Do you consider for example the effects of the trauma of colonisation? I know that psychology has accepted the relevance of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder).
I understand that much of the research done in this area has focussed on the trauma suffered by the Jewish survivors of the holocaust of World War Two. I also understand the same has been done with the Vietnam veterans.
What seems to not have received similar attention is the holocaust suffered by indigenous people including Maori as a result of colonial contact and behaviour.
The Waitangi Tribunal made such a reference in its Taranaki Report of 1996 and I recollect what appeared to be a "but our holocaust was worse than your holocaust" debate. A debate I must add, I do not wish to enter.
Psychologists, Emeritus Professor James and Professor Jane Ritchie likewise link colonisation with violence.
Native American Psychologist Eduardo Duran suggests in referring to Native Americans that the colonial oppression suffered by indigenous people inevitably wounds the soul.
He also says that for any effective therapy to take place the historical context of generations of oppression since colonial contact needs to be articulated, acknowledged and understood.
Professor Mason Durie identifies the onset of colonisation and the subsequent alienation and theft of the land as the beginning of Maori health issues that manifest themselves today. Issues, that have as a result of inter-generational systemic abuse, become culturally endemic.
Since first colonial contact, much effort has been invested in attempts at individualising Maori with the introduction of numerous assimilationist policies and laws to alienate Maori from their social structures which were linked to the guardianship and occupation of land.
A consequence of colonial oppression has been the internalisation by Maori of the images the oppressor has of them. It is for that reason that I found the negative portrayal of Maori whanau last week to be both spiritually and psychologically damaging.
I know the psychological consequences of the internalisation of negative images is for people to take for themselves the illusion of the oppressors' power while they are in a situation of helplessness and despair, a despair leading to self-hatred and for many, suicide.
The externalisation of the self-hatred on the other hand, is seen with the number of Maori who are convicted of crimes of violence and the very high number of Maori women and children who are the victims of violence.
The film 'Once Were Warriors' and the Keri Hulme novel, 'The Bone People' bring home all too graphically the extreme levels of violence which for many, is seen as culturally endemic behaviour, behaviour which they and the wider society in which they live, see as 'normal'.
The phenomenon of Post Colonial Traumatic Stress Disorder and its effects it appears are now culturally integrated in to the psyche and soul of Maori. It never used to be there. Indeed as Professor Anne Salmond has found, children were indulged and records of early contact show that violence towards children was uncommon. More uncommon than it was in Europe at the same period. A golden age for Maori children it would seem.
Maori tribal commentators and Treaty negotiators like Dr Hirini Mead of Te Runanga O Ngati Awa have alluded to the cumulative generational effects of trauma or as he put it 'damage' which has been passed down from the period of the Land Wars to current generations.
A question Dr Mead has posed was related to the amount of compensation required to repair the intergenerational damage to the people. Damage, the genesis of which resides in the nineteenth century.
The holocaust suffered by many Maori tribes during the Land Wars needs to be acknowledged. Only then will the healing for Maori occur.
Indeed some of the events surrounding Treaty of Waitangi land settlements have resulted in healing for the whanau of ancestors murdered by the State in State institutions.
The bones of these ancestors have been taken from the gaols and returned to their tribal homes. The return of these physical and spiritual ancestral remains have resulted in the descendants, who generations before, left their tribal lands in shame, also returning 'home'. For these families, the healing can now begin.
For Maori, indeed for all indigenous people the issue is the identification of the trauma, as Post Colonial Traumatic Stress Disorder in order to site the issue in its proper historical, political and economic context.
This would also encourage considering the continuing oppressive effects of colonisation and the various forms it has taken as Native American academic Ward Churchill says, "since predator came."
The signs and symptoms of Post Colonial Traumatic Stress Disorder (PCTSD) with Maori, needs analysis and examination.
My challenge would be for the few Maori psychologists amongst you, to lead the discourse on that analysis.
Following are some indicators of the results of post colonial trauma.
* Have a poor self-image.
* Have a tendency to self belittle.
* Tribe deprived of land by government dishonesty and theft.
* Parents/grandparents beaten for speaking their mother tongue.
* Members unable to identify with tribe.
* Identity now based on where they live (urban) and not on genealogy and ancestry.
* Fearful of imprisonment unless cousins are also incarcerated.
* Subjected to personal, institutional and cultural racism.
* Beat up spouse, children and siblings.
While much of my address to you today has focussed on the effects of colonisation and has considered that macro position, at a local and personal level I would like you to also consider the following.
Does your training and education address issues like the nature of the Maori kai tiaki, the spiritual guardian all Maori have? What if I told you I have been visited a number of times by my kai tiaki and had carried out a conversation? What if I said to you that my kai tiaki had cautioned me about a particular action?
What for example is mate Maori? (Maori sickness)
What is makutu?
What is the nature of the rau kotahi; the multiple self?
Finally in terms of our world-views, what is the difference between you saying "I think, therefore I am" and us saying "We are."
Kia ora tatau.
* * *