''Personally, I'm devastated that after all these years of fighting the good fight, to find that reason and science lost over money and ulterior motives. It's sad to see that non-profit organisations are bullied and overridden by corporate greed and unjust laws.''
The decision meant Morgan faced permanent captivity in a barren concrete tank. It was effectively a death sentence because captive orca lived on average 8.5 years compared to more than 50 in the wild.
The Free Morgan Foundation said in a statement that Morgan would become a poster-child for the fight against ''this barbaric and antiquated form of entertainment''. The group's long-term aim was a law ensuring no other animal in need could be turned into an animal used for profit.
The Raad Van State also rejected the Foundation's Morgan Release Plan, saying it was not a realistic or satisfactory alternative to captivity at Loro Parque. Nor were the judges convinced Morgan's family group had been located, or that the orca would be able to feed itself in the wild.
They said Loro Parque was experienced in keeping orca and the fact the park engaged in commercial activities did not make it unsuitable for Morgan. As for allegations that Morgan was being mistreated, the judges said the orca's health was not a matter for the case under consideration.
Dr Visser, however, said the judges were not qualified to assess whether Morgan's release plan was feasible. They had listened to big business and ignored much of the evidence put before them. Under European law they should have taken Morgan's welfare into account.
''The system has completely failed her,'' she said.
The campaign to free Morgan would continue.