Nibiru is supposed to set off cataclysmic earthquakes on November 19, according to David Meade. Photo / 123RF
Nibiru is supposed to set off cataclysmic earthquakes on November 19, according to David Meade. Photo / 123RF
In September, to much fame, a man who claimed to have studied astronomy in Kentucky and deciphered the Book of Revelations predicted an ominous sign would appear on September 23 and foretell the world's end.
"It's a very biblically significant, numerologically significant number," David Meade told the Washington Post then.
A series of catastrophic events would follow the omen, he claimed, culminating in the appearance of a mysterious planet called Nibiru and the end of "the world as we know it". Meade's claim sold a lot of tabloids and YouTube ads. When September 23 passed with no omens or calamities, Meade revised his very numerologically significant date to October 15, which also came and went uneventfully.
You might think two consecutive misfires would quash the Nibiru theory. Instead, it's simply transcended its erroneous author.
Meade isn't even mentioned in the latest batch of tabloid stories, which quote yet another doomsday theorist to warn that the end of all things is not on September 23 or October 15 - but now November 19, when Nibiru is supposed to set off cataclysmic earthquakes.
"November 19th will see earthquake Armageddon across huge swaths of the planet," the Daily Express wrote in representative tones. The paper cited as evidence unnamed "astronomers and seismologists" - and an illegible picture of the Earth, covered like pincushion in quake markers.
Try to pin down the "astronomers and seismologists" who supposedly support this theory, and you end up at PlanetXNews.com, a conspiracy website that Meade sometimes writes for. The quake-pocalypse theory comes to us courtesy of a different author, Terral Croft. He writes that seismic activity has been increasing around the world as the massive "Black Star" (Nibiru has many names) wheels around the edge of the solar system, upsetting the planets within.
But Nibiru, as far as science can tell us, simply doesn't exist. "It would be bright. It would be easily visible to the naked eye," a Nasa scientist wrote several years ago. "It would already be perturbing the orbits of Mars and Earth." In other words, it doesn't look much like the end times.
