A major new Kiwi study will help unlock the mystery of why premature birth affects health later in life.

Each year, around 5000 babies are born prematurely in New Zealand, and although most survive, they have a greater risk growth and learning problems and adult diseases such as obesity and diabetes than babies born at term.

The University of Auckland research project will investigate whether giving specially boosted nutrition to preterm babies in the first crucial days of life could prevent diseases later in life and help intellectual development.

It will also look at whether this optimal nutrition may differ for boys and girls.


"Nutrition offers the simplest and least expensive way of improving long-term health outcomes for these babies," said study leader Professor Frank Bloomfield, director of the Liggins Institute at the university.

"It's the first step towards personalised medicine for preterm babies."

The clinical trial, the biggest on pre-term nutrition, is the centrepiece of a research programme that received almost $5 million from the Health Research Council last month.

Researchers will also analyse mothers' breastmilk to see if milk produced for girl babies contains different nutrient or hormone concentrations to milk for boy babies.

"We know that preterm boys don't do as well as preterm girls," said Professor Bloomfield, who also works as a neonatologist at Starship Hospital.

"Currently boys and girls are fed the same. But boys and girls have known metabolic differences.

"Boy babies are bigger on average, some concentrations of amino acids are different in boys than in girls and yet there is very limited evidence as to whether we should be feeding girls and boys differently."

Preterm babies faced many difficulties with feeding, and lack the fat stores laid down in the final weeks of pregnancy to sustain them until their mothers' milk supply comes in.


They also can't co-ordinate sucking, swallowing and breathing, so can't breastfeed safely, which tended to delay milk supply.

The more immature they were, the less their guts can tolerate milk feeds.

Often, the mothers are unwell and take longer to establish a good milk supply.

The standard practice in hospitals was to feed very pre-term babies -- those born before 32 weeks -- a sugar solution mixed with a nutrient blend of proteins, minerals and vitamins intravenously.

Although there was good evidence that this improved growth and intellectual development for very pre-term babies, there was almost no guidance for doctors when it came to babies born at 32-36 weeks, and practice varied widely.

One common approach was to give babies sugar solution intravenously while gradually increasing the amount of milk fed via a nasogastric tube down the nose into the stomach, finally shifting to breastfeeds when the baby matures.

"While waiting for mother's milk or for feeds to be tolerated, we don't know whether sugar water by itself is appropriate, or whether we should include other nutrients such as protein," Professor Bloomfield said.

"Also, some evidence suggests there could be a trade-off. Enhanced nutrition may be good for intellectual development but actually increase pre-term babies' later risk of metabolic and heart disease by speeding up weight gain.

"We hope this study will show how and what to feed preterm babies to prevent this trade-off."

In the trial, called Diamond, the aim for all babies was to establish full feeds into the stomach with mothers' own milk as quickly as possible.

While this goal is being reached, which could take many days in smaller babies, babies would receive just sugar water intravenously, sugar water plus protein intravenously, or human milk substitute via the stomach feeding tube.

Researchers will investigate the effect of these three feeding approaches on growth, body composition, milk tolerance and gut microbes, which may influence later risk of obesity.

They will also look at whether letting preterm babies smell and taste milk before tube-feeds helps them feed normally earlier.

"Tube-feeding bypasses three important signals that help you regulate eating: smell; taste, and stopping eating when full," Professor Bloomfield said.

In a pilot study, very preterm babies had a cotton wool bud soaked in milk placed against their lips and in front of their nose before each tube-feed. They tolerated full feeds to the stomach earlier, and had their nasogastric tubes removed earlier, than babies in the control group who couldn't smell or taste the milk.

A team led by Professor David Cameron-Smith, also from the Liggins Institute, would analyse breastmilk of 190 mothers of preterm girls and boys in the trial.

"Breastmilk is very complex, providing all the required nutrients and hormones for growth and immune development," Professor Cameron-Smith said. "We know that there are differences in the composition of breastmilk mothers make for boys and girls. But almost nothing is known of milk mothers can supply premature infants.

"This research will help identify the critical ingredients that help stimulate feeding and are essential for health. We speculate that these ingredients will differ between premature boys and girls."

Researchers plan to recruit 530 babies and their families from Auckland and Middlemore Hospitals.

Alongside the human trials, researchers will investigate whether certain nutrients can protect the pancreas in preterm lambs, reducing later risk of diabetes.

"Getting the nutrition right at the outset promises to make a significant difference in the lifelong health and development of preterm babies," Professor Bloomfield said.

"We're grateful for the HRC grant that's allowing Liggins Institute researchers to push the frontiers of this exciting field."