nzherald.co.nz

John Armstrong: Clever reshuffle adds punching power

By John Armstrong
5:30 AM Tuesday Feb 26, 2013
Labour Party leader David Shearer. Photo / APN

Labour Party leader David Shearer. Photo / APN

Cabinet or caucus reshuffles are the stuff of nightmares for Labour chiefs.

The need to accommodate gender, ethnic and other factional interests must be balanced against the need to go into parliamentary battle with the the strongest line-up possible.

David Shearer has pulled it off. Yesterday's reshuffle of shadow portfolios is very different from the one he instituted on becoming leader 14 months ago. His reluctance then to tread on too many toes after beating David Cunliffe in a post-election ballot left Labour fighting National with one hand tied behind its back.

The net effect was that of the five priority areas identified by the leader as critical to the party's 2014 election chances - economic growth (or the lack of it), housing, jobs, health and education - Labour has been all but invisible in the past three.

Those portfolios were held by MPs not well disposed to the combative side of parliamentary politics. At the same time, some of Labour's heavy-hitters were left with minor portfolios. That imbalance has been remedied.

Deputy leader Grant Robertson, who had held the environment portfolio, is now in charge of employment and training, thus harnessing one of Labour's best and brightest to what is shaping as the No 1 election issue - jobs.

The switch also ups the ante on National by making a potential future Labour leader face off with a potential future National leader, Steven Joyce. He has largely had an easy ride until now. Robertson nobbling Joyce would be a major scalp for Labour. But vice versa for National.

Likewise Annette King and Tony Ryall in health. King had barely had the role for five minutes when she lashed into Ryall.

It is not so much the case with Chris Hipkins in education. Hekia Parata is already beyond redemption in most people's minds.

Shearer's clever reshuffle also makes use of two other long-serving, but highly effective MPs. Phil Goff has been given licence to make trouble for National across the whole public service - rather than just the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Similarly, Trevor Mallard has been given the shadow internal affairs spokesmanship which covers issues such as ministerial travel and credit card spending.

Where Shearer has demoted MPs - except for Lianne Dalziel, who falls out of the top 20 - he has shunted them down only a few rankings.

He has also made it pretty clear to Cunliffe that there is a road back from the wilderness.

By John Armstrong
Gandalf (St Heliers) | 12:02PM Tuesday, 26 Feb 2013
National also juggles its front bench to include women and Maori etc. This is no longer a centre left thing. Labours line up is good but they will only win on the big issues around deficits and debt.
kiwigal (Auckland Central) | 12:02PM Tuesday, 26 Feb 2013
I hope that Labour get it right this time, N.Z. can not stand many more years of a National Government, there won't be a country fit to live in if Labour don't win the next election. I would love to know who the 51% are that are supporting the actions of the National Government - are people blind to what is happening? High unemployment, housing overcrowding, dismantling the education system....
Surdo Oppedere (Auckland Region) | 12:02PM Tuesday, 26 Feb 2013
So the Labour party is all about leadership challenges and reshuffles. A good indication that they don't actually have a sensible policy on anything. I can just imagine if they get into government their solution to the housing crisis, a cabinet reshuffle, the solution to problems in education, another cabinet reshuffle, economic woes - just have another cabinet reshuffle or maybe a leadership challenge.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited