nzherald.co.nz

John Armstrong: Partial backdown shows National has eye on election

By John Armstrong
5:30 AM Tuesday Feb 19, 2013
Hekia Parata. Photo / Getty Images

Hekia Parata. Photo / Getty Images

Hekia Parata or no Hekia Parata in the job, Cabinet ministers had few illusions from the start about the difficulty of persuading Christchurch's citizens of the desirability of post-earthquake school closures whoever was Minister of Education.

National's nervousness about the closures triggering a much wider political backlash in the city against the governing party was plain in yesterday's partial backdown from the initial proposals announced in such messy fashion last September.

The number of school closures and "mergers" has been reduced from 31 to 19 - which is about the annual average across New Zealand in recent years.

In one stroke, the Cabinet has cut the number of affected pupils by about half from just over 7300 to 3800 out of an overall student population in the greater city of around 72,000.

But the strongest pointer to how National has been feeling the heat is the decision that the majority of the region's schools still earmarked for closure will shut their doors at the end of the final term this year rather than in 2015 or later as had initially been mooted.

Ministers are clearly punting that if affected pupils are in their new school at the beginning of 2014 then they (or more importantly vote-wise their parents) will have adjusted by the time the election rolls around later in the year.

Weighing on John Key and his colleagues' minds is the need to buttress National's hold on the the city which applauded the party for its handling of the post-quake recovery by increasing National's party vote in Christchurch at the last election from just under 90,000 to just over 95,000.

With Labour's share in spectacular decline - from around 97,000 in 2005 to just over 51,000 at the last election - National won the party vote in the supposed Labour fortresses of Christchurch Central and Christchurch East.

To hold onto power after the next general election, National's strategists somehow have to stop those cross-over voters who have no real allegiance to their party shifting back to Labour.

The school rationalisation exercise was always going to jeopardise National's retention of that "soft" vote. Much of the damage from the quakes was in east Christchurch.

Thus many of the affected schools are in those two seats.

Hence yesterday's drastic revision of the numbers.

While the media will focus on the shock and dismay surrounding the closures, many parents and teachers will have been mightily relieved last night.

They will not thank Parata, despite her putting in a much more polished performance yesterday.

But what National is really hoping is that those voters - and the many more beyond Christchurch - will recognise the message that National is a Government which still listens.

By John Armstrong
Lunar One () | 09:41AM Tuesday, 19 Feb 2013
The Election is not about Christchurch despite the corporate state media propaganda. It is about the Unemployed, the departing graduates and the state of Education, and the Homeless. It is relative to all of New Zealand. Parata is doing a better job driving a bulldozer than the PM handing out grants to the private sector. But for that performance deployed against public interest in favour of ideology have rings of the ambitious devil around her. How a leading light for National could come from Porirua and Mana defies traditional culture but an effective plan just the same.

Take another look at the boundaries of amalgamation and closures, the hidden agenda is disguised in the details. Just like dismantling the working class and middle managements where teachers must submit to third party individuals and corporate rules anytime soon.

When there is no good news to boast about, we are insulted and bombarded with images of Parata and Joyce. And we must endure all bad news from now on until the next election.
sean (Waikato) | 09:41AM Tuesday, 19 Feb 2013
National probably had only 19 earmarked for closure or mergers all along. However this article say's it all. This is now about vote gathering.How can it be that a school can have input into decision making when the education ministry turns up on it's doorstep and dictates that it will be closing?

Judging by your summation John, the government has no interest in the "people" who have been affected but only in the self interest of regaining power. Using your analogy of a government that listens, perhaps they won't sell assets now.
Steve (New Zealand) | 09:48AM Tuesday, 19 Feb 2013
Even if National polls well in Christchurch in 2014, the tide is going out for National and its lack of coalition partners will be its real problem.
The voters have quite clearly had enough of Act, United and the Maori party. Recent events have proved again how unreliable Winston first are.
It could be time for a cup of tea with Colin Craig.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited