Charis Palmer: We're fatter than we care to admit
Both genders and all age groups tended to under-report their weight and portion sizes. Photo / Nicola Topping
People are increasingly reporting their weight as lower than it is, skewing data on obesity rates, according to an Irish study.
The study, published in online science journal Plos One, found the gap in obesity levels between people self-reporting their body mass index (BMI) and having it measured is getting larger, making obesity rates seem lower.
Researchers knew that people typically reported their weight as lower than their actual weight. People also self-report their height to be significantly higher than their measured height.
"This research suggests that over time the problem has become more severe," said Joseph Proietto, Professor of Medicine at the University of Melbourne.
"It would suggest that any surveys that rely on self-reported height and weight will underestimate true obesity prevalence unless adjusted."
The researchers sought to establish if self-reported height bias or weight bias, or both, was responsible for the declining sensitivity in the obese category between self-reported and clinically measured BMI.
They found self-reported height bias had remained stable over time, but self-reported weight bias had increased for both genders and in all age groups, particularly the obese.
"This latest research supports the notion that as the population continues to gain weight, under-reporting becomes more of an issue," said Tim Crowe, Associate Professor in nutrition at Deakin University.
"The same finding is also seen in under-reporting of types of foods eaten, especially foods high in fat and sugar, and the serving sizes of meals," Professor Crowe said.
The research authors said the results must be cautiously interpreted, as the study numbers used in two of the sample groups included less than 200 people.
Professor Crowe added that BMI itself was far from perfect, with waist circumference a more useful measure of overall health risks.
"Waist circumference specifically targets the most dangerous type of fat - visceral fat," he said.
"Measures above 102cm for men and 88cm for women carry a very high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and even some forms of cancer."
Professor Proietto said underwater weighing, DEXA scanning, and Bod Pod assessment were more accurate than BMI, however none were feasible in large population studies.
"BMI is simple and cheap and useful, provided one is aware of its limitations."
Read the full study here.
http://theconversation.edu.au/
Over 40 studies showed that there were more heart attacks with those of normal BMI than those with a higher BMI which shows that it gives a false paint stroke of what is healthy....
For something that has been around since 1972 why isnt there some better form of measurement than BMI?
I would rather advocate for blokes to have a regular checkup and leave it between them and their clinican
We returned from a Christmas trip back to the US a few weeks ago and both noted that there is not a lot of difference between NZ and US any more. It has become much worse in the US, but obesity and morbid obesity is a serious problem in both countries.
I occasionally hear someone talk about it being related to genetics. Rubbish. It is what we eat and lack of exercise.