nzherald.co.nz

Editorial: PM's foreign investment stance correct

5:30 AM Saturday Jan 26, 2013
Those opposed to foreign investment ignore the fact that it has always driven the New Zealand economy. Photo / Mark Mitchell

Those opposed to foreign investment ignore the fact that it has always driven the New Zealand economy. Photo / Mark Mitchell

John Key has not always been an unalloyed advocate of foreign investment. In mid-2010, as the rumblings over the sale of the Crafar farms to Chinese investors began, he was worrying about New Zealanders becoming "tenants in their own country". All the more reason, therefore, to welcome the clarity of the message in yesterday's state of the nation speech. This country, the Prime Minister said, had to be a magnet for investment. "The more investment we get, the more jobs will be created," he added to reinforce the point.

An unemployment rate of 7.3 per cent, the highest since 1999, may have concentrated Mr Key's mind. So might the example of Taranaki, where substantial oil and gas investment has prompted a low unemployment rate and faster-growing workers' income than elsewhere in the country. Whatever the reason, the Prime Minister has become an unequivocal supporter of investment from any source.

"That's investment by individuals and small businesses as well as big businesses; and it's investment by people from overseas as well as Kiwis," he said.

In that context, New Zealanders' placement at "the front of the queue" for shares in the part-sale of state assets would be an exception, rather than the rule, the Prime Minister indicated. Unequal treatment is a common occurrence worldwide when such assets are sold and will not unduly disturb potential overseas investors. Mr Key did, however, put all investors on notice that the Government intended to proceed with the part-sale of a second power company this year in addition to that of Mighty River, which is scheduled to start before mid-year, subject to Supreme Court rulings.

His straight talking will not have been welcomed by those opposed to the sale of the Crafar farms and, indeed, any foreign investment. But he is right to try to project a consistent and principled approach. Those opposed to foreign investment ignore the fact that it has always driven the New Zealand economy. Therefore, it is folly to send the wrong message to potential investors. Opponents also disregard the fact that a country with limited domestic savings - a situation compounded these days by the emphasis on investment in rental property - needs to be as welcoming as possible to overseas capital.

The impact of New Zealanders' investment preference on housing affordability prompted another of the stronger statements in Mr Key's speech. The Government wanted, he said, to co-operate with local councils to ensure more houses were built at a lower cost.

"In particular, we are keenly awaiting the Auckland Council's spatial plan, and I'm expecting it to include multiple options for both greenfields and brownfields residential property development." If councils were not able to change their planning processes, said Mr Key, the Government would have to get a lot more proactive.

That represents a clear challenge to the Auckland Council's preference for a compact system. It wants Auckland to go up, rather than out. The Prime Minister's stand is, however, the right one. If young adults are to have access to affordable housing in Auckland, some greenfields developments will have to be part of the picture.

Mr Key says he has told his ministers to "step up momentum". He is signalling a greater willingness to venture into areas of obvious tension. The problems confronting the Government demand nothing less.

Steve (New Zealand) | 02:26PM Tuesday, 29 Jan 2013
"He is signalling a greater willingness to venture into areas of obvious tension". Yeah right. That's why we hear so frequently on Radio NZ's Morning Report "the Minister was not available for comment ....", "the Minister refused to comment .....".

With Key there is no such thing as the "straight talking" the editorial claims to identify.
raegun (Bay of Plenty) | 02:27PM Tuesday, 29 Jan 2013
In the case of farms, rental property, our necessities to life (water, power) an absolute, unequivocal and unapologetic NO to foreign onwership and believe me that is what it is, ownership.

I wish people would stop fudging the meanings of the words "investment" and "ownership".

It's sure looking like Key's words about us becoming tenants in our own land, were merely weasel ones.

All he has done now is make the likes of me even more determined to stop this
ray21 () | 02:27PM Tuesday, 29 Jan 2013
This Herald Editorial article is quite correct about the "Conflict" between The Auckland Council and Government over their Spatial Plan where the Emphasis is on Building upwards not outwards. Mayor Len Brown and his Council are right behind the High Density Housing Plan while the Public are opposed to being confined into High Riase Apartments blocks as Children need ground to play etc.

Auckland Council is embued with High Rise to justify the Inner City Rail loop as potential Rail Transport Customers. Auckland house prices are a reflection on 7 years on the old ARC Growth Strategy which placed limits on the City Boundaries. A shortage has been created so "Up Go the prices" into a self created financial Storm for Young home owners.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited