nzherald.co.nz

Kerre Woodham: Army uniformity all part of the job

By Kerre McIvor
5:30 AM Sunday Dec 9, 2012

I was interested to read the story of British soldier Jatinderpal Singh Bhullar, who is a member of the Scots Guard F company.

That's the company responsible for public duties and guarding the Queen. Guardsman Bhullar is a Sikh and he has asked for and received permission from his army bosses to wear his turban instead of the traditional bearskin hat when he's on duty.

That has sparked a debate within Britain over the rights and wrongs of the decision. I'm with those who say he should conform.

Bhullar says as a devout Sikh he cannot cut his hair or beard and his hair must be covered at all times with his turban. That's fine - I understand and respect that.

I would be horrified if he was told that he could only join the military if he had to have a short back and sides - that would be in direct contravention of his religious beliefs. But he can still wear his turban underneath his bearskin.

Indeed there are images of Bhullar wearing a hard hat over his turban during his airborne training, so clearly there are no objections to headpieces covering the turban. And besides, there are all sorts of turbans: day-to-day ones; sporting turbans; ceremonial turbans.

It's not as if there is one turban that rules them all and that must be worn and be seen to be worn.

Sikhs have a proud history and are considered to be great fighters.

Turban-wearing Sikhs have fought alongside British armies in wars for more than 100 years - but they wore turbans within their own regiments. It was part of their uniform.

A uniform is a uniform for a reason - it brings people from different backgrounds together and makes them a team - and the Scots Guard ceremonial dress is a bearskin hat.

Bhullar knew what he was signing up for when he joined the Guard. Now he's trying to change the rules. A bit like the parents who enrol their child in a school, sign the piece of paper that says they promise to abide by the rules, then complain to anyone who'll listen if their darling is sent home for dyeing his hair pink or wearing the wrong shoes.

I'd love to hear from Sikhs in New Zealand. why are you not able to wear a hat over your turban? It seems provocative to ask for a dispensation to be the only person in the company to look different. Traditions and customs are important, but surely they are just as important to the Scots Guard as they are for Jatinderpal Bhullar.

By Kerre McIvor

- Herald on Sunday

Pied Piper (Auckland Central) | 03:10PM Sunday, 09 Dec 2012
Many these days are doing things not normally accepted by the status quo, because companies,employers whoever, are scared of being labelled racist, when in fact I dont believe most people care what colour your skin is it is how you behave. Hence we have a politically correct society which is doing nothing to further peoples acceptance of each others cultures or harmony between cultures. Giving preferrential treatment just gets peoples backs up and works in the opposite way to which it is intended.
snapper (Birkenhead) | 03:10PM Sunday, 09 Dec 2012
Nicely put Kerre. Reasoned and fair.
John C (Mt Albert) | 03:11PM Sunday, 09 Dec 2012
Harbhajan Singh wore a turban of sorts throughout most of his cricketing career but was always content to cover it with a helmet when facing fast bowlers.

I'm sure Sikhs have to wear helmets when riding motorcycles where that is the law, hard hats on construction sites and if any of them ever wanted to become astronauts or deep sea divers they would wear the appropriate apparel.

Take a trip outside the space station without your suit and your body would explode - simple choice really - if you want to do the job wear the kit. Simple really.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited