The book that changed the world is a cliche often used but rarely true. Yet 50 years ago a book appeared that profoundly altered the way we view the Earth and our place on it: Rachel Carson's Silent Spring.
This impassioned and angry account of how America's wildlife was being devastated by a new generation of chemical pesticides began the modern environment movement: it awoke the general consciousness that we, as humans, are part of the natural world, not separate from it, yet we can destroy it by our actions.
A middle-aged marine biologist, Carson was not the first to perceive this, to see how intimately we are bound with the fate of our planet; but her beautifully-written book, and the violent controversy it generated, brought this perception for the first time to millions in the United States, Britain and around the world.
Down the centuries many people had expressed their love for nature, but Silent Spring and the furore it created gave birth to something more: the widespread, specific awareness that the planet was threatened and needed defending; and the past half-century of environmentalism, the age of Green, the age of Save The Whale and Stop Global Warming, has followed as a natural consequence.
Serialised in The New Yorker on June 16, 1962, Silent Spring was published on September 27 and revealed to a horrified America - or at least, to those who did not know already - that its wildlife was being wiped out on a staggering scale by use of the new generation of synthetic pesticides, compounds made in the laboratory rather than from naturally occurring substances, which had followed on from the forerunner of them all, the chlorinated hydrocarbon DDT.
In particular, the songbirds of America's countryside and small towns were everywhere falling silent. They had been killed by colossal pesticide spraying programmes, usually from the air, sanctioned in the 1950s by the US Department of Agriculture, individual states and local authorities, and aimed at insect pest threats, which turned out to be largely illusory.
There was no need for them; their real driver was the American chemical industry, which had managed to convince US agriculture that its bright new range of deadly super-poisons, organochlorines such as aldrin and dieldrin and organophosphates such as parathion and malathion, were just the wonder drugs that farming needed - in huge doses.
Even now, it is hard to read Carson's account of these mass sprayings without incredulity, like the 53014ha in Sheldon, Illinois, sprayed with dieldrin to get rid of the Japanese beetle. "It was a rare farm in the Sheldon area that was blessed by the presence of a cat after the war on beetles was begun," she wrote.
Tens of millions of hectares were covered in poison in campaigns against the spruce budworm, the gypsy moth and the fire ant, none of which succeeded in eradicating their targets but all of which exterminated countless other wild creatures - the American robins on suburban lawns, the trout in forest streams - to the bewildered dismay of the local people watching it happen around them.
Carson's achievement was to bring the situation to national notice in a remarkable synthesis of dramatic reportage and deep scientific knowledge, explaining exactly what the new pesticides were, how their catastrophic side effects were occurring, and how senseless were the mass spraying campaigns (although she recognised that agricultural pesticides were necessary and did not advocate banning them all). To a reader today, her account is compelling and entirely convincing.
Yet it produced an explosion. The US chemical industry and parts of the US scientific establishment lashed out in frenzy against this presumptuous upstart holding them to account, with a long and bitter campaign of criticism and personal denigration; and it seemed as if what aroused their ire more than anything was the fact that their opponent was a woman - "an hysterical woman".
A professional biologist from Pennsylvania who had worked for the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Carson was 55 when Silent Spring appeared. Unmarried and childless after a life spent looking after her mother and her young nephew, she had found emotional solace in a deep friendship with a neighbour at her Maine holiday home, Dorothy Freeman, about which there has inevitably been speculation; certainly, they were very close. Yet Carson was more than a scientist, she was also an acclaimed author, having written a trilogy of highly praised books on the marine environment, one of which, The Sea Around Us, of 1951, had been a best-seller.
Thus when Silent Spring appeared, she already had a substantial audience, and the furore stirred up by the US chemical industry only served to boost it a thousandfold; by the end of 1962, three months after full publication, the book had sold half a million copies, and public opinion was solidly behind her. (It did nothing to hinder her cause that President John F. Kennedy took her side and referred Silent Spring to his Science Advisory Committee, which vindicated her stance the following year.) So the madness of the mass poison sprayings came to an end, and the robins and their song returned to America's spring; DDT was banned for agriculture in 1972 (although it remained in use for malaria prevention), and bans on dieldrin, aldrin and other substances followed.
Carson did not live to see it: she died of cancer in 1964. But her achievement was much more than to end a crazy and murderous assault upon nature, enormous though it was.
What she introduced to a mass audience for the first time, in explaining how the catastrophe was happening, was the idea of ecology, of the interconnectedness of all living things, of the connectedness between species and their habitats.
The pesticide falls on the leaf and the leaf falls to the ground, where it is consumed by worms, who also consume the pesticide; robins consume the worms and consume the pesticide too, and so they die.
In showing how everything in the natural world was linked, she showed how humans were part of it too, and how human interference could wreck it, could wreck the balance of nature built up over billions of years.
That is a commonplace insight now, but in 1962 it was a new one. It was truly radical, because it implied - for the first time ever - that scientific advance and economic growth, closely linked as they were in America, might not be endlessly a good thing. There was the Earth itself to consider.
And that perception has been at the heart of the movement that Silent Spring inspired, 50 years ago.
Born: Rachel Louise Carson on May 27, 1907 in Pennsylvania.
By the time Carson wrote Silent Spring, she was already a respected marine biologist and bestselling author. The quiet girl raised in a dysfunctional family came to blossom beyond expectation. Before she was published, she had studied at the Pennsylvania College for Women and Johns Hopkins University. Carson's studies in genetics and zoology were impressive, as was the fact that she, as a woman, became a scientist in the 1930s.
Died: 1964, two years after Silent Spring was published and a month before her 57th birthday, of breast cancer. Her death gave rise to the Silent Spring Institute in Newton, Massachusetts, which is dedicated to studying environmental impacts on breast cancer.
What they say: "To my mind, Silent Spring is one the finest examples of apocalyptic writing you can find. Rachel Carson set us on the path to thinking about how to live. Period." - Linda Lear, Carson's biographer and author of Rachel Carson: Witness for Nature.
"It occurred to me, it's one of the few books you can say changed the world. There aren't many, and Silent Spring is one of them." - Attilio Favorini, writer of a play based on Silent Spring and founding chair of the Pittsburgh University's department of arts and theatre.
"Her broad message, that we need to act in moderation and achieve a balance with nature, has still not been fully grasped. - Conor Mark Jameson, author of Silent Spring Revisited.
Silent Spring Revisited, a re-examination of Rachel Carson's legacy, by Conor Mark Jameson (Bloomsbury) is out now.