Herald on Sunday editorial: Won't someone please think of the children?
5:30 AM Sunday Sep 23, 2012
Photo / Thinkstock
If you're trying to decide on a school for your children, send them to Marian Catholic School in Hamilton East.
Not because its pupils are the highest achievers in our comprehensive national standards survey - they're not. Not because it has the best ERO report, or is within walking distance.
No, send them there because principal John Coulam is the sort of role model our kids need.
With all the tunnel-visioned idealogues on either side of the national standards debate, he was one of the few courageous enough to listen to the arguments.
As chairman of Waikato Principals' Association, he had formally advised his members against disclosing their pupil pass marks to media - but on discussion, he accepted it was better to talk through school results with parents than hide information from them.
He even sent out amended advice to his members, and emailed Marian School's results for publication in today's Herald on Sunday.
Coulam shows a refreshing intellectual honesty. Too often, the debate about publishing school results has been dominated by politicians seeking easy wins in the opinion polls, and principals more interested in protecting their positions than protecting their pupils.
At the Ministry of Education, it is doubtful any official believes this data provides authoritative comparisons between children's writing ability in Kaikohe and Bluff. When the ministry was asked to name an education expert who could explain the scheme's benefits, an adviser just laughed.
After categorically assuring schools their data would be published as they supplied it, Education Minister Hekia Parata's officials immediately set about fiddling the data to fit into identical boxes - facilitating the construction of ranked league tables.
On the other side, principals sent out an emotive form letter warning that comparing schools would be "potentially harmful to students". The Auckland Primary Principals Association issued questionable legal advice on how schools could get out of disclosing their results.
In fact, buried within the national standards dross is valuable information about how boys are struggling, the decline in writing skills, and Pacific children getting lost at the back of the classroom.
If the idealogues on either side would stop to think, they might realise it is better to intelligently discuss pupils' results than try to hide them.
That, after all, is what it's all about - the kids.
Why? What was wrong with the structure of the system thirty years ago? I would suggest nothing.
Adding subjects to the curriculum to keep pace with technology I can understand. But this constant reinvention of the education system based on political ideology is wasteful. It should be about the kids, a great article New Zealand Herald.
I don't have a problem with some website that lists ncea or exam results for schools. However it should also list other measures pertinent to a school like bullying policies, education office reviews of the school, and teacher evaluations (some overall measure for the school).
Parents then get a feel for the quality of the school. What is wrong is for the Ministry to form this information into a league table as it cant be done as its impossible to know how to weigh each variable.