nzherald.co.nz

Shelley Bridgeman: Asexual people are not freaks of nature

11:00 AM Thursday Sep 6, 2012
New Zealand author, Keri Hulme. is openly asexual.
Photo / File

New Zealand author, Keri Hulme. is openly asexual. Photo / File

Despite dire predictions from those who believe marriage should be an exclusively heterosexual institution, the sky didn't begin to fall in when the marriage equality bill convincingly passed its first reading in parliament. In order to capitalise on this mood of open-mindedness sweeping the nation, perhaps the time is right for members of other sexual minority groups to redouble their efforts to raise awareness levels as they continue their bid for acceptance within the community.

People who are asexual - that is, do not experience sexual attraction to others - have long had something of a low profile. Yet momentum is slowly developing. Five years ago when I wrote No sex please, we're asexual for the Herald on Sunday there were only a dozen people on the mailing list of Asexuality Aotearoa. Now it's believed more than 154 people from New Zealand participate on the US-based Asexual Visibility and Education Network website Yet, in light of estimates that 1 per cent of the population is likely to be asexual, that figure is clearly but the tip of the iceberg.

In 2007 I sought comment from New Zealand's most well known asexual, Booker prizewinning author Keri Hulme who believes the profile of asexuality needs to be raised "[p]rimarily for the sake of young asexual people who may not be aware that they aren't sick or ruinously different - just wonderfully rare." Hulme identifies as an "aromantic asexual" - that is, she is not romantically attracted to others.

Myths about asexuality abound. It is not a disorder that needs treatment or curing. It is not the same as abstinence or celibacy. It is not "caused" by sexual abuse. Asexual people are not freaks of nature. And, contrary to popular belief, people are not asexual just because they haven't met the right person yet.

Asexual people often feel like misunderstood outsiders in our sex-obsessed society. Yet it's unsurprising that confusion reigns in the general population. Asexuality is far from straightforward. According to asexualawarenessweek.com, "Behavio[u]r does not necessarily mirror orientation. Asexual people still choose to engage in sexual activities for a variety of reasons and that does not make them any less asexual." And some of them just like group hugs as explained in Sexless orgies sate desire for cuddles.

New Zealand's asexual community has been campaigning to achieve recognition of asexuality as a separate sexual orientation alongside heterosexuality, homosexuality and bisexuality. Asexuality Aotearoa considers its particular brand of sexuality to be just as valid and distinctive as the aforementioned. To complicate matters, an asexual person may also be hetero-romantic, homo-romantic or bi-romantic. One study found that 33 per cent of asexual people were in long-term relationships.

Almost 700 reader comments on The Observer piece Among the asexuals revealed a high degree of interest and curiosity about what it means to be asexual. Some respondents pitied asexual people while others variously considered asexuality to be "liberating", "overly complicated" and "a convenient box".

My own favourite quip about asexuality appeared on a T-shirt that read: "Just lie back and think of England. Yeah right."

FMax (New Zealand) | 01:35PM Thursday, 06 Sep 2012
The problem with asexuality is that true asexuals are extremely rare, most are just people trying to pretend to be special in some way. Asexual means 'without sexuality', yet many asexuals claim to feel romantic love, but romantic love is based on a sexual attraction - the science is pretty straight-forward on these matters.
The whole thing is built on junk science, e.g. The website states celibacy is a choice, that's not always true. Campaigning for recognition seems a waste of time, lots of people live their life without romance through various circumstances, no need to pretend some of this group are extra-special.
Nan (Rodney) | 01:35PM Thursday, 06 Sep 2012
Well written article, containing some myth-busting comments.
However, as with any "sexual orientation" - Isn't it a very private, personal issue?
Does the rest of the world care - really?
Surdo Oppedere (Auckland Region) | 02:53PM Thursday, 06 Sep 2012
Objection here: "outsiders in our sex-obsessed society", aren't children part of society, and what about the elderly including a generation that didn't need to talk about sex, aren't they a part of society? Then there are those who have chosen celibacy, and those who have limitations imposed by a range of physical and psychological conditions, are they all not part of society? It is probably only a small proportion of real society which is sex-obsessed.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited