Get The Answers: Reducing the pain of redundancy process
Craig Mundy-Smith is a senior associate at Bartlett Law. Photo / Supplied
It can pay dividends to treat your staff with respect, writes Craig Mundy-Smith.
Many employers dread the prospect of making staff redundant.
The process is damaging to relationships and many redundancies end in an atmosphere of bitterness.
But there are steps you can take to reduce the collateral damage of redundancy.
What is it about redundancy that is so hard on the people involved?
Employers tend to focus their energies on ensuring the business case for the restructure is robust and the procedures followed are technically correct.
Far less attention is given to the feelings of the people involved. As a result, the process becomes very impersonal, sometimes appearing to be conducted by hatchet men with clinical brutality.
Employees who have been told, perhaps for years, that they are indispensable members of a tightly knit team, perceive a radical change in the way they are treated. Suddenly, they are mere cogs in a machine, surplus to their employer's requirements. No wonder they feel betrayed.
What mistakes do employers make in their treatment of redundant staff?
Redundancy is an unpleasant process for all concerned. But by remaining clinical and detached you are making things harder for the employee.
Employees want to be treated as respected and valued participants in restructuring decisions. It is their future that is at stake.
For many employees, anger at being treated with disrespect is their primary reason for pursuing a personal grievance.
What they often want, but seldom receive from employers, is a personal apology. Disregarding the feelings of your employee can be expensive.
Does the Employment Relations Act 2000 reflect this?
The Employment Relations Act 2000 and the law interpreting and applying the act focus on mutual respect between employer and employee.
If you truly value your employee as a person, you will act in good faith and be open and communicative.
You will provide them with all the information they need, listen carefully to what they have to say, be open to new ideas, and give them the time and resources they need to respond to you.
That's what a reasonable employer would do, and what all employers ought to do.
Once you understand the philosophy behind the law, it makes compliance with your obligations easier.
The procedures you follow are not a mere checklist, they are part and parcel of treating your employee with integrity and dignity.
There are other advantages to the kinder, gentler approach.
The primary legal remedy granted to employees, where there have been defects in the redundancy procedure, is compensation under section 123(1)(c)(i) of the act for "humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings".
Larger awards of compensation will be granted where the split was acrimonious, hostile and hurtful, with lesser sums being awarded where the parties remain on relatively good terms.
Being polite and tactful really can pay dividends.
What simple things can employers do to minimise collateral damage?
My recommendations are:
* Always obtain professional advice when restructuring your business. There are many pitfalls for the unwary.
* Show a little empathy. Your employee will be scared, confused and angry. That's normal.
* Acknowledge your employee's contributions to the business. Emphasise that they have a lot to be proud of.
* Separate the people from the problem - the redundancy is not a reflection of the employee's personal qualities or performance.
* Don't sugar-coat your message, as this can be misleading.
* Don't talk down to your employees. They are mature enough to hear hard truths.
* Allow employees to say goodbye to their co-workers in their own way, and let them know they will be missed.
Don't restructure for the sake of restructuring. Often a restructure and redundancy is unnecessary, you actually need to look at where waste is generated in your business and sometimes you will be very surprised to find that it is the employees who generate your profits rather than being a cost to the business.
Keep the unions involved and informed every single step of the way. Unions aren't there just to fight employers. Most will work hard with an employer to improve productivity and find efficiencies if it means they save their member's jobs. They can also help you avoid many of the pitfalls described above.
3mnths after the assembly plant closed to do pre delivaries .Be nice iff they had contacted me .We had the clasue in our closure agreement which no one has been able to explain why it was out in our closure agreement it reads as follows Future use off the facility.
In the event of Toyota nz or any subsidary of Toyota developth site for any purpose other than its current use then employees made complosory redundant will be given prefernce off employment subject to meeting necessary skill and aptitude requirments.
Such preference shall apply if employment is required immediatly following compleation of vehicle assembly and there after for a period of 12 months .Out side contractors such as the aa were brought on to the site and the engineers union just dumped us
He was very caring and talked to us and comae up with a method of chosing who to make redundant.
I was chosen, even though I was top salesman and had been there longest, and had suggested that we actually call on our customers.
But then a week later he appointed a new sales rep.