nzherald.co.nz

Bernard Hickey: Methinks boomers protest too much

By Bernard Hickey
5:30 AM Sunday Jul 22, 2012
Home buyers now pay almost twice as much to buy a house as in the 1980s and 1990s, relative to incomes. Photo / Chris Skelton

Home buyers now pay almost twice as much to buy a house as in the 1980s and 1990s, relative to incomes. Photo / Chris Skelton

Last week's column about the need for an intergenerational wealth and debt deal struck a nerve.

I was swamped with comments from outraged baby boomers telling me to stop the blame-gaming.

I was told to get back in my box with the rest of the lazy, selfish, whingeing Generation Xers and Ys.

I was told the youth of today never had it so good with all their Xboxes and iPads and 5 per cent interest rates.

I was told the baby boomers had to cope with 20 per cent interest rates and had to work harder and longer for less. I was told they had worked hard and paid taxes all their lives and they were "due" their pension at 65.

Now the rebuttal. Firstly, on the argument that it was just as hard to buy a house in the 1980s and 1990s as it is now. Productivity Commission figures show the national house price to disposable income ratio rose from 2 in 1980 to around 3 in 2003, before doubling to almost 6 in 2008. It is now 5. Treasury figures show the percentage of gross income needed for an average mortgage payment rose from around 35 per cent in the mid 1990s to a high of 65 per cent in 2008 when interest rates hit 10 per cent. It is now 45 per cent.

Essentially, home buyers now pay almost twice as much to buy a house as in the 1980s and 1990s, relative to incomes. The relative costs are much worse in Auckland.

Property is much more expensive for first-home buyers now than in the 1980s and 1990s. First-home buying would now be impossible for most, particularly in Auckland, if interest rates were not at record lows. It also requires both income earners in a home to stay working.

Secondly, on the argument that baby boomers worked hard for that property wealth and don't deserve to have it taken off them. Reserve Bank figures show the net equity in housing wealth more than doubled from $203.5 billion in 2002 to $456.7 billion in 2007.

Property owners' wealth rose the equivalent of more than 125 per cent of GDP in five years. That wealth was not earned or built.

Final word to Stephen, a listener to a Radio NZ interview with World War Two veteran Bob Wood recently.

"As his generation passes, I consider it important to acknowledge how great his generation was. They had a childhood marred by The Depression and a youth lost at war. An acknowledgement of what they did is why I and others of the younger generation have been going to Anzac Day parades in recent years. That generation's children, the baby boomers, come across as shallow and self-absorbed in comparison. They dismantled the welfare state and even disrupted Anzac day parades in the 1970s. They labelled these poor traumatised men as war criminals. I would like to say to the Bob Woods - thank you."


Debate on this article is now closed.

By Bernard Hickey

- Herald on Sunday

OccamsRazor (New Zealand) | 09:45AM Sunday, 22 Jul 2012
Bernard, I'm not a baby boomer. And you ARE playing the blame game. Like most socialists (and children), you seem to think life should be fair - and you use that to justify your desire to redistribute the wealth from those who have it to those who want it.But life isn't fair. And you aren't entitled to a house, or anything else you want, just because you want it.

Maybe a lot of baby boomers have stuff they didn't 'earn'. But what have you done to earn the wealth that you plan to take from those undeserving baby boomers and give to yourself?
Thinker (West Auckland) | 09:46AM Sunday, 22 Jul 2012
Wow really?

Bernard I am disappointed you have had an experience with a baby boomer being shallow and self-absorbed. Is that justification to somehow label all baby boomers like that?

There will always be some things harder and some things easier in any period of time. But to look at the generation that has gone before with such envy and resentment speaks volumes and is the very thing you appear to be so critical of in your last paragraph.

My father served in world war two, lived through the great depression when people darned socks and everyone grew their own vegetables. I have attended anzac cove in Turkey and appreciate those that fought for this country.

I have no feelings of envy towards anyone that has more than me, good on them, rather I focus on making my own future. I am "X" generation born 1970.
andy (Epsom) | 09:46AM Sunday, 22 Jul 2012
I support the transfer of wealth between generations. But I missed out on the residential property bonanza. I watched from the sidelines as the financially illiterate homeowners suddenly became convinced they were investment geniuses as their properties trebled in value.

I have just my savings from working for many years. If we inflate our currency, I watch my savings taken from me by the next generation. Why can't we tax property instead of devaluing savings?
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited