nzherald.co.nz

Don Kavanagh: What else can we tax?

By Don Kavanagh
9:30 AM Tuesday Jul 17, 2012
Deadbeat drinkers seem not to know - or care - when they've had enough. Photo / Thinkstock

Deadbeat drinkers seem not to know - or care - when they've had enough. Photo / Thinkstock

We've been inundated recently with studies and surveys that tell us we are all drinking ourselves to death.

Fair enough: any number of deadbeat swine turn up in court on any given day, claiming that they would never have battered that little old lady had a brewery not held them down and poured booze into them.

May I ask what happened to people taking responsibility for their own actions?

I don't want to get into the state of drunkenness that may lead to legal implications, and I know my limits. So I count the number of drinks I've had. The mathematics isn't that complicated.

I know where the border lies between being sparkling and funny and being a dick. I learned where it was and others should, too. It really is as simple as that.

We are drinking less now than we were 10 years ago, but the anti-alcohol lobby has persuaded everyone - especially the media, I am ashamed to say - that our streets are awash in cheap grog and our children are moving from the play pen straight to the public bar.

Certainly, there are problems in this country with the way young men and women drink. Clogging their bodies with cheap grog, then annoying the hell out of more responsible drinkers is hugely irritating.

As for the idea that increasing the excise tax will cut drinking, it's hard to see how the Government could tax alcohol any more than it does. On a litre bottle of spirits with a $36 price tag, the total tax is about $24. That's two-thirds of the actual price. How can they squeeze any more blood from that particular stone?

I'm sorry to bang on about this in a column that is supposed to be about enjoyment, but it really rips my undies when hand-wringing prohibitionists get a free ride in the media and the industry is dismissed as simply a self-interested mob of social polluters.

It's enough to drive any sane person to drink.

By Don Kavanagh

- Herald on Sunday

Alan_Wilkinson (Russell) | 10:53AM Tuesday, 17 Jul 2012
There is a fundamental issue here: taxpayer-funded lobbyists should be outlawed.
There is no justification for taxpayers funds to be spent on political and public lobbying. It should be outlawed completely and the auditor-general empowered to enforce that.
RSA () | 10:53AM Tuesday, 17 Jul 2012
I do not know if more taxation on alcohol will necessarily be a deterrent to getting drunk. Unlike Don a lot of people do not know when enough is enough. How about providing more rehabilitation facilities for all types of drug use. I know this requires money but sitting back and doing nothing about the problems and societal costs of alcohol consumption in NZ is wrong too.
Art (New Zealand) | 11:36AM Tuesday, 17 Jul 2012
Damn right. The wowser faction is attempting to take over society and the country. Personal responsibility applies to the drunken dopes who stay out until comatose. What happened to anti intoxication laws and arresting drunks and putting them in cages until sober. Oh yes, the PC wowser faction don't like that either and by proxy have encouraged the problem.

There is a Police show called Coppers that follows UK cops on duty. One commented the drunk problem had increased from an hour of disorder a night to all night with bars open all night. Well how about that! Sound familiar.

The solution seems obvious, limit bar and liquor sales hours back to how they were 20 years ago and reduce the problem. How simple, how un-PC. However, it just doesn't suit the wowsers who want to tax the drink of a pensioner in the bowling club for what others are doing at night.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited