nzherald.co.nz

Kerre Woodham: Horror crash calls for compassion

By Kerre McIvor
8:26 AM Sunday Jun 17, 2012
The crash site near Turangi. Photo / Glyn Hubbard

The crash site near Turangi. Photo / Glyn Hubbard

Anyone with an ounce of compassion would have to feel for 20-year-old Stephen Houseman. He's the young man from Boston University who was behind the wheel of a van carrying fellow students on an exchange programme.

They were intending to walk the Tongariro Crossing but shortly before they reached Turangi the van rolled.

Four of the passengers, who weren't wearing seatbelts, were thrown on to the road after the accident. Three of those young people died and one of them has many years of recovery ahead of her.

This week Houseman pleaded guilty to driving charges - careless driving causing death and careless driving causing injury - and was convicted and discharged, disqualified from driving for six months and ordered to pay $132 court costs.

Alhough I accept that an accident resulting in the loss of three lives, and the life of another being altered irrevocably, is a dreadful, terrible thing to have happen, surely this is one of the few instances where this crash was a genuine accident?

There was no speeding involved. No alcohol. No drugs. He wasn't texting; he wasn't changing radio stations; he wasn't lighting a cigarette; he wasn't trying to eat a hot pie. He had asked the students repeatedly to wear their safety belts.

This was no hoon.

Houseman simply came around a corner, drifted very slightly, over-corrected and hit gravel. His only faults, if faults they be, were that he was an inexperienced driver unused to driving the sort of people-mover they were in, and was unfamiliar with New Zealand roads.

Even the families of the victims understood it could have been any one of their kids behind the wheel. The parents of the most seriously injured of the young students, who took their daughter back to the United States this week, understood that no one was to blame. "This was an accident. Nobody was intentionally doing anything that would harm anyone," they said.

Does someone always have to be blamed? Do we always need to find a culprit or scapegoat?

The judge conceded that the carelessness was slight but the outcome was huge, and therefore a discharge without conviction was inappropriate. But this young man will live with the consequences of that ill-fated road trip for the rest of his life.

Could he not have been treated with compassion rather than put in the dock in a courtroom? Or does the death of three young people outweigh any mercy that could have been shown to him?

By Kerre McIvor

- Herald on Sunday

Richard D (Tauranga) | 10:57AM Sunday, 17 Jun 2012
How can the degree of carelessness be light. He was the driver and responsible for the passengers lives. He was driving to fast for his experience level in that vehicle, and so driving the vehicle beyond it's capabilities, whats the difference between that misjudgement or any other misjudgement a driver makes that causes road deaths.
Spiritfree (New Zealand) | 11:14AM Sunday, 17 Jun 2012
Actually, he could - if his passengers refused to put on their seatbelts - have done something. Simply stopped the car and said either you put them on or I drive you no further. If passengers refuse to do so, then it could easily be argued that not stopping the car is negligent.

Toyota Estimas are not exactly prone to roll over, are they? I've driven one and they are one of the easiest cars that I've ever had the pleasure to drive. In every country of the world which have any significant stretches of countryside there are roads which can be considered dangerous.

New Zealand needn't beat itself up over this. It has a large land area relative to its population.

It sounds to me like he was acting like a bit of an idiot. There are plenty of people who have acted like idiots who are languishing in NZ's prisons. But they are not students from Boston.
Chuck Bird (Ngaruawahia) | 01:17PM Sunday, 17 Jun 2012
Spiritfree, it is easy to be wise in hindsight. You anonymously call the driver an idiot. Do you know more about the accident than the judge? The road code says that passengers 15 years and over are responsible for making sure that they wear their own safety belts correctly and that they keep them fastened while the vehicle is in motion.

I think a good lawyer could argue that the passengers not wearing seatbelts contributed significantly to their own fate. The driver obviously wanting to get back home did not have that opportunity.

Callous comments like yours do little good to New Zealand tarnished image due to crimes against tourists.
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited