Dana Johannsen: New test for school of hard knocks
5:30 AM Thursday Sep 13, 2012
Contact sport is her to stay but attitudes towards injuries needs to change. Photo / Getty Images
If a massive cultural shift is what is needed to tackle sport's concussion crisis, then it's not just up to coaches and administrators to make that happen.
The sobering research coming out of the US that has found repeated head knocks in NFL players may cause lifelong neurological problems - highlighted in the Herald's special report this week - should make us all reflect on our own attitudes to head injuries in sport.
There seems to be widespread nonchalance when it comes to the issue.
Some say, just like Sonny Bill Williams-fatigue (also known as So Bloody What?) and Lindsay Lohan's failing career, the media are to blame.
Or at least, according to research undertaken by Massey University, play a part in reinforcing a casual attitude to head injuries.
The study, conducted by former psychology student Natasha Bauer during last year's Rugby World Cup as part of her clinical psychology dissertation, involved watching the television coverage of all 48 games of the tournament.
Bauer noted the commentators tended to downplay the possible effects of head knocks on players by describing such incidents through jokes and colloquial expressions.
How often do you hear commentators refer to a player wobbling around "like a drunken rhino" and being "knocked for six" or, in an allusion to the symptoms following an on-field clash, "wonder how many sets of goal posts he's looking at now?" while their sidekicks chuckle along?
Those tired cliches have become just as outdated in their sentiment.
Then there are the television segments like Smashed'Em Bro, which, with the assistance of slow-motion replay, celebrate brutality.
There's nothing wrong with celebrating a great tackle, but there is something a little bit sadistic in applauding a hit that injures.
It's the old watching-motorsport-to-see-the-crashes syndrome; ferocious hits are an integral part of the entertainment package.
Leaving it all out on the field is what we expect of our footy stars. Perhaps we need to tweak our attitude slightly to "leave it all out on the field fellas, except your brain cells".
Too often we see professional rugby and league players receive a blow to the head, stumble around a bit, get a drink of water from the trainer, shake it off and carry on.
When kids see their heroes playing on when they are obviously affected by a head knock, they think they're being courageous; what they need to think is that they're being stupid.
There is no way children are going to stop playing contact sports, nor should they - the rough and tumble of games is an important part of being a kid.
Contact sport is here to stay, but our attitude towards head/brain injuries needs to change.
Everyone with a stake in these sports, from the games' marketers to media to fans, has a role to play in reinforcing the point that concussion is no laughing matter.
In the end though isn't that the reason people always call athletes the modern gladiators because we all have known for some time that alot of them are going to suffer in the long run.
Alot should be done but only so much can be done. The next dwon this line of thought will be the damage done to the heart through longterm overexertion or something as ridiculous.
In many ways this is why professionals get paid so much and we need to come to terms that there is consequences to what you do.
In saying this some steps should still be taken
With advance technology available to athletes and yet performance are only ordinary suggests the way humanity is heading. Backwards!
Drugs are more readily available in rich nations, and the trend follows that rich nations have a better winning rate. The opposite is true of poor nations.