nzherald.co.nz

Movie review: A dangerous method (+trailer)

By Peter Calder
7:00 AM Friday Apr 27, 2012
Keira Knightley in a scene from A Dangerous Method. Photo / Supplied

Keira Knightley in a scene from A Dangerous Method. Photo / Supplied

Disclosure: I've never much rated Keira Knightley as an actress, though she was great as a kid in Bend It Like Beckham because she was one, and her limpid beauty and robotic manner suited the otherworldly narrative of Never Let Me Go. But her performance in this painfully wooden historical drama is surely the most irritating she's turned in yet.

She plays Sabina Spielrein, the Russian doctor who was a patient of Carl Jung (Fassbender, normally reliable but here all at sea) before working with him and Freud (Mortensen, with a fake nose). Her idea of the sex drive as potentially destructive or transformative informed both men's later work and she is generally regarded as the first female psychoanalyst.

An interesting character, you might think, but in Cronenberg's exquisitely dreadful film she starts as a gibbering wreck - her overshot jaw and rolling eyes look like a bad audition for a Z-grade horror movie - before quietening down enough to recite dialogue that sounds alternately like it's been cut and pasted from an encyclopaedia or nicked from a Monty Python sketch. It's a crying shame, because there are a dozen actresses who could have done better but the film goes for Knightley's marquee appeal (she gets spanked while topless, if that's your thing).

Christopher Hampton (the brilliant Dangerous Liaisons and Carrington) adapted the script from his own play The Talking Cure - the name Jung gave to his radical new method of treating mental distress. But what he's come up with is a film of conversations (Sex. Dreams. Mothers) and clunky expository dialogue, quite devoid of dramatic zing or human chemistry.

It's hard to believe that the story of three people essentially inventing the modern idea of the human mind could be so boring.

It was interesting to be reminded of the detachment that the two men brought to a field now so fraught with politics and moralising, but both are like museum exhibits come to life: Freud emerges as a slightly vacant bore and Jung as wet and sleazy. They deserved better.

Stars: 2/5
Cast: Viggo Mortensen, Michael Fassbender, Keira Knightley, Vincent Cassel
Director: David Cronenberg
Running time: 100 mins
Rating: R16 (violence, drug use, sex scenes)
Verdict: Exquisitely dreadful

-TimeOut

By Peter Calder
Malcolm Falconer (Auckland Central) | 10:04AM Friday, 27 Apr 2012
I normally agree with you on most film reviews, however I don't on this one. The whole neurotic thing in Victorian era was typified by females - who the film typifies accurately as sexually repressed and basically breeding bags for grandiose and entitled philandering males- who had somatic repression manifesting in physiological distortions ie glove paralysis, catatonia and the sort of bizarre facial distortions Knightly exhibited.

I thought that while uncomfortable to watch it made interesting comments on the social and cultural manifestations of mental illness - just as Cronenberg's earlier film, Spider showed the modern-day mentally ill.
TIANA ALEXANDRA () | 10:59AM Sunday, 29 Apr 2012
You missed the point, listen to malcolm who knows what he is talking about. Everyone go see the exquisite informational classic touching movie. Viggo mortenson rocks and christopher hampton. A brilliant writer!
caro (New Zealand) | 10:59AM Sunday, 29 Apr 2012
Why oh why was Keira Knightley even considered for this film when there were so many other actresses who would have done better and would have given at least a modicum of credibility? Her performance was excrutiating to watch and at times laughable - what on earth were they thinking?
Copyright ©2013, APN Holdings NZ Limited